100% agree. FreeCol is still technically in beta, some removal of dead weight code should be considered, if not encouraged. FreeCol should take advantage of any features of Java 1.7 that it can. On Jul 24, 2015 2:56 PM, <win...@genial.ms> wrote:
> Hi, > > it crossed my mind that some time ago people were complaining > about the Mac builds not working. I did not pay much attention > back then, as I don't have one and don't know about them, but > I thought I should remind you. > > Another thought I had was, that the codebase collected many > compatibility hacks from the overly long 0.10.x series. > I did a search and there are about 243 hacks for 0.10.x and > about 141 hacks for 0.11.x already. > The 0.11.x series already had 3 patch releases for 0.11.0, which > is in line with how it was done until 0.9.x. > We have new features implemented in addition to all the bugfixes, > which also suggests increasing the minor version. > So, I would like going to 0.12.0 directly. > After the release we could drop 0.10.x compatibility and get rid > of 2/3 of the hacks. > > > Regards, > > wintertime > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Freecol-developers mailing list > Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
