Github's revenue model is comprised of private repos, private teams, and
their enterprise SaaS and enterprise on-prem solutions. Both of which the
last 2 large corporations I've worked for have migrated to. They are not
going to change their open/public model because that is what drives their
prima
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:37:20AM +1030, Michael T. Pope wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:29:56 +0100
> Fenyo wrote:
> > I still don't get it, this is way too general.
> > Could you please be a little more specific?
>
> No. I am being deliberately guarded. I was told some things in
> confidence
In case you decide to move to GitHub as the primary location of the
repo, please add push access to @translatewiki to ensure translations
updates will keep working.
-Niklas
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:29:56 +0100
Fenyo wrote:
> I still don't get it, this is way too general.
> Could you please be a little more specific?
No. I am being deliberately guarded. I was told some things in
confidence, and similarly I am not confident I have the whole story.
However, from open
Hi,
>> What do you mean by "github has its own politics"?
> There have been some interesting management gyrations. I have met people
> who left with hard feelings. Sourceforge has its problems, but there are
> non-zero concerns over how sustainable github is. However for now, it
> seems to be d
Just checked https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/site-support/
and commented on this bug:
#14496 server close my connection actively
which describes what I am seeing.
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 01:31:05 +0100
Fenyo wrote:
> What do you mean by "github has its own politics"?
There have been some interesti
Hi,
> In other words, just move the main code repo.
> If reliability is the main goal I think I would prefer an add operation
> rather than a move. Make github (or other, github has its own politics)
> repo the primary but automate synchronizing to sourceforge as a backup.
Yes, this is an even b
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:05:20 -0600
Caleb Williams wrote:
> As posted a few days ago, I a strong supporter of moving FreeCol's Git
> repository away from SourceForge. Keep the issue trackers, releasing and
> mailing lists there. Also we can keep the web there too.
In other words, just move the mai
All:
As posted a few days ago, I a strong supporter of moving FreeCol's Git
repository away from SourceForge. Keep the issue trackers, releasing and
mailing lists there. Also we can keep the web there too.
Caleb
On Feb 19, 2017 1:29 PM, "Fenyo" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
>
> *> As to the suggestion
Hi,
> As to the suggestion for leaving SF, I fear it would be more difficult
> than you think, because there is no forums on github and finding new
> replies on its single issue tracker can be harder.
Ok, then just put only the GIT-REPO part to GitHub,
and use it with the SF Forums and BugRep
S like git
makes it easier to grab stuff off repos on other hosts.
Greetings,
wintertime
Gesendet: Sonntag, 19. Februar 2017 um 14:57 Uhr
Von: Fenyo
An: Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: [Freecol-developers] SourceForge is unusable again
Hi folks,
I write
Hi folks,
I write this email mainly to Mike,
but after all, it's everyone's concern.
Today SourceForge is unusable again.
I can not pull from the Repo, it always gives me this:
---
git.exe pull -v --progress "origin"
fata
12 matches
Mail list logo
