Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.4-RC1 - some minor things

2025-01-04 Thread Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel
Hi, > On Jan 4, 2025, at 6:02 PM, Eric Auer via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > > Hi Jim, > [..] >>> - move BOOTFIX to BOOT >> The package description is "Bootfix is a boot sector repair tool" so >> I'm okay moving this to "BOOT" > > Good. It also makes SYSLINUX less lonely :-) > >>> - add METAKE

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.4-RC1 - some minor things

2025-01-04 Thread Kirn Gill II via Freedos-devel
Arguably, Bootfix doesn't belong in BOOT because BOOT should only be bootloaders. However, due to the nature of the program, BOOT is actually a good fit even though it technically doesn't belong. We should eventually get GRUB4DOS in BOOT as well (which, if my bad memory serves me correctly, we don

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.4-RC1 - some minor things

2025-01-04 Thread Eric Auer via Freedos-devel
Hi Jim, Yes, you have asked about these before. We discussed these on the email list months ago. Ah. Good point. I was not aware of FDTUI being buggy, so maybe it is indeed good to drop it. - move BOOTFIX to BOOT The package description is "Bootfix is a boot sector repair tool" so I'm o

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.4-RC1 - some minor things

2025-01-04 Thread Jim Hall via Freedos-devel
On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 3:46 PM Eric Auer via Freedos-devel wrote: > > I have probably made those suggestions before. > What are your thoughts/votes on the following? Yes, you have asked about these before. We discussed these on the email list months ago. > > - keep FDTUI in APPS, or move to GUI

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.4-RC1 - some minor things

2025-01-04 Thread Jim Hall via Freedos-devel
On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 4:00 PM Jim Hall wrote: [..] > FDTUI is a buggy file manager. I think Ercan shared it when it was > sort of working, and it got included in the distribution for some > reason. But I think that was too early. FDTUI doesn't really do > anything. We should drop it. If people wa

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.4-RC1 - some minor things

2025-01-04 Thread Jim Hall via Freedos-devel
Willi wrote: [..] > >> b) fdtui is a tumbler. I think it is really enough to download it via > >> fnpkg. [..] tom ehlert wrote: > > +1 Jerome Shidel wrote: [..] > Personally, I do not use FDTUI and have no issue with just leaving it > out. So, I’ll “+1” just having it as a downloadable package.

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.4-RC1 - some minor things

2025-01-04 Thread Eric Auer via Freedos-devel
Hi! At present, FDTUI is located under the Application group and is therefore on the Install Disc (not the BonusCD). The consensus was (starting with 1.4) to install all packages on the Install CD when Full is chosen in order to help reduce confusion. To not install FDTUI with full, we hav

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.4-RC1 - some minor things

2025-01-04 Thread Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel
Hi, > On Jan 4, 2025, at 3:07 PM, tom ehlert via Freedos-devel > wrote: > >  >> b) fdtui is a tumbler. I think it is really enough to download it via fnpkg. >> > > +1 > > Tom At present, FDTUI is located under the Application group and is therefore on the Install Disc (not the BonusCD).

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.4-RC1 - some minor things

2025-01-04 Thread tom ehlert via Freedos-devel
> b) fdtui is a tumbler. I think it is really enough to download it via fnpkg. +1 Tom ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.4-RC1 - some minor things

2025-01-02 Thread Fritz Mueller via Freedos-devel
Some minor things I noticed in FDT2501 (1.4 RC1), some of them will have to wait for the next kernel:   a) At doszip (dz) "Tools - View Doszip" does not work. You can simply make this work by modifying: "Tools - Add tools - [TOOLS] - 2 View &DOSZIP.TXT,%view% %dosdir%\doc\doszip\doszip.txt" (corr