Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

Hi, I’ve already worked out a better solution. It is in the process of being deployed. To avoid any confusion, I’m waiting until it has been fully deployed/implemented before providing additional details. Probably, I’ll discuss it more tomorrow. But, the time stamp issue is Completely

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

Hi, I’ve already worked out a better solution. It is in the process of being deployed. To avoid any confusion, I’m waiting until it has been fully deployed/implemented before providing additional details. Probably, I’ll discuss it more tomorrow. But, the time stamp issue is Completely

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 6:27 PM wrote: > ... > If anyone has suggestions for how to get git to set timestamps on files, I > would be greatful. I currently use diffs and git history to see changes. > ... > After some suggestions and research I found a decent compromise. Using git-tools, the

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

Hi Jeremy, > Unfortunately that is a side effect of git, it doesn't set time stamps. > I find it very annoying but haven't found a good solution. I have no > desire to manually set timestamps. If anyone has suggestions for how to > get git to set timestamps on files, I would be greatful. I

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

Hi Jeremy, could you share some roadmap for the documentation/changelog updates for kernel 2043 and freecom 0.85, to make planning easier when it comes to including updates in FreeDOS 1.3rc5? I guess this could also include being more specific about the "work of others" in the to be updated

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

>> FreeDOS kernel 2043 and FreeCOM 0.85 >> >> Jeremy Davis has been working to update the FreeDOS kernel and >> FreeCOM, the FreeDOS command shell. Jeremy has shared new versions on >> GitHub. Thanks Jeremy! > The changes are mostly the work of others and they deserve most of > the

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

Le dim., 13 juin 2021 19:13:45 -0400 écrit On Sun, Jun 13, 2021, 4:44 PM tom ehlert wrote: > Unfortunately, ALL files in the kernel source download have the same > timestamp, making it impossible to see what was last changed when :-o ALL times of

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

On 2021.06.13 23:27, perditi...@gmail.com wrote: Why is it necessary to have a special FORCELBA edition? Should that not be accessible via SYS CONFIG, without the need for a separate compile? Also, not all 386/486 have proper LBA support in the BIOS, so users of those would

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021, 4:44 PM tom ehlert wrote: >> > While I have not seen it discussed here yet, >> >> > https://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/news/2021/06/freedos-kernel-2043-and-freecom-085/ >> >> IMHO this is not acceptable. >> >> freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net used to be the place to

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021, 4:44 PM tom ehlert wrote: > > > While I have not seen it discussed here yet, > > > > https://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/news/2021/06/freedos-kernel-2043-and-freecom-085/ > > IMHO this is not acceptable. > > freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net used to be the place to discuss

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

> Hi Jeremy, Jim and Tom, Hi PerditionC, > while I do not think that Jeremy deliberately avoids > contributions, his long-standing habit of tinkering > on the kernel and shell in silence fails to motivate > others to contribute or comment changes and keeps us > in the dark about relevant

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021, 4:07 PM Eric Auer wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, Jim and remaining kernel and shell experts, > > While I have not seen it discussed here yet, > > > https://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/news/2021/06/freedos-kernel-2043-and-freecom-085/ > > writes: > > > FreeDOS kernel 2043 and FreeCOM

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

Hi Jeremy, Jim and Tom, while I do not think that Jeremy deliberately avoids contributions, his long-standing habit of tinkering on the kernel and shell in silence fails to motivate others to contribute or comment changes and keeps us in the dark about relevant improvements and bugfixes unless

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

Sorry about that. I thought Jeremy was going to share his update to the freedos-devel email list, so I didn't repost for him. Yes, there's a new version of FreeCOM and the kernel out. I started testing them this morning. I found one issue in FreeCOM 0.85 thanks to Burkhard M. When running a

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

> While I have not seen it discussed here yet, > https://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/news/2021/06/freedos-kernel-2043-and-freecom-085/ IMHO this is not acceptable. freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net used to be the place to discuss about freedos development. changing this without even

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS kernel and FreeCOM command.com updates

Hi Jeremy, Jim and remaining kernel and shell experts, While I have not seen it discussed here yet, https://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/news/2021/06/freedos-kernel-2043-and-freecom-085/ writes: > FreeDOS kernel 2043 and FreeCOM 0.85 > > Jeremy Davis has been working to update the FreeDOS