Hello Bret Johnson,
That's why I referred to both "playing" and "listening" in my original statement -- I did
that on purpose. The _purpose_ of music is to be heard, not to merely be played (e.g., when no one is
listening). The musicians are in fact deciding who can and can't listen to
>> For example, I know it's a big deal these days for musicians to
>> claim that somebody who disagrees with their politics can't play
>> their songs (at things like political rallies). Basically, they're
>> declaring who can and can't listen to their music.
> It's not who can or can't listen,
Hi all,
When it comes to releasing something as public domain, I think “The Unlicense”
(aka CC0) is a great choice and maintains the spirit of public domain.
Basically it says, do whatever you want with it. But, don’t blame me if it
doesn’t work or breaks something.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 2:38 PM Robert Riebisch wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> > The Creative Commons have identified a "CC-0" ("Creative Commons
> > Zero") that indicates "no rights reserved" that does the same thing.
> > https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/cc0/
>
> May I apply CC0
Hi Jim,
> The Creative Commons have identified a "CC-0" ("Creative Commons
> Zero") that indicates "no rights reserved" that does the same thing.
> https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/cc0/
May I apply CC0 to computer software? If so, is there a recommended
implementation?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 1:33 PM Bret Johnson wrote:
>
> I'll try to search for an appropriate license and e-mail it to
> you. I've been searching though a little bit of licensing info and
> really didn't know that even declaring that something is "public domain"
> doesn't necessarily mean what
On Mon, 29 Aug 2022, Bret Johnson wrote:
I'll try to search for an appropriate license and e-mail it to you.
I've been searching though a little bit of licensing info and really
didn't know that even declaring that something is "public domain"
doesn't necessarily mean what you think it means.
I'll try to search for an appropriate license and e-mail it to you. I've been
searching though a little bit of licensing info and really didn't know that
even declaring that something is "public domain" doesn't necessarily mean what
you think it means. I suspect it may ultimately have
You can attach a license statement to it (such as cc0 public domain, or
MIT, or whatever) and email me (off list) a zip file. I can post this on
the FreeDOS files archive at Ibibio.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2022, 8:10 PM Bret Johnson wrote:
> I don't use SourceForge or GitHib or anything like that. The
I don't use SourceForge or GitHib or anything like that. The source is in A86
(actually, A386 since there some Pentium-specific instructions). One of the
things I was going to do before releasing it was to convert it to NASM. That
takes quite a bit of work and time that I don't have right
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022, 9:42 AM Bret Johnson wrote:
> I have a program but have never officially released called ISLOADED which
> I can upload/email to whoever wants to use/see it (including the source
> code). It tests for lots of things like video, serial/parallel ports,
> ANSI,
I have a program but have never officially released called ISLOADED which I can
upload/email to whoever wants to use/see it (including the source code). It
tests for lots of things like video, serial/parallel ports, ANSI,
DPMI/DPMS/VCPI, mouse driver, character device drivers (by name), etc.
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 1:27 PM Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel
wrote:
>
> Following the modification of my idea proposed by Tom: run edit32 on 386+
> else run edit... BTW thanks Tom!
I believe CC386 had a 386+ text editor also using D-Flat.
> I have been looking a bit for a simple
Have you tried pcem?
https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/
Emulates cpus, video cards and more !!
El vie, 26 ago 2022 a las 21:01, Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel (<
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>) escribió:
> Thanks Jim about VINFO /m to detect CPU!
> I did not knew it, or at least I had totally
Thanks Jim about VINFO /m to detect CPU!
I did not knew it, or at least I had totally forgotten it.
The sad part of it, is that it is so fancy that one cannot use virtual machines
to test different CPUs, because it detects the virtual machine rather than the
virtual CPU.
So that Eduardo's
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 1:27 PM Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel
wrote:
>
> Following the modification of my idea proposed by Tom: run edit32 on
> 386+ else run edit... BTW thanks Tom! I have been looking a bit for
> a simple program that would identify approximate CPU and return it
> as an error
Hi Paul,
I've just put this together with the cpu identification code I use in
vmsmount. Tested only in a 386, I don't have an 8086 emulator at hand.
https://github.com/eduardocasino/cpucheck.git
Cheers,
Eduardo
El vie, 26 ago 2022 a las 20:26, Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel (<
Following the modification of my idea proposed by Tom: run edit32 on 386+ else
run edit... BTW thanks Tom!
I have been looking a bit for a simple program that would identify approximate
CPU and return it as an error code that batch file could used.
I did not found that (especially with free
18 matches
Mail list logo
