Jim Hall wrote:
> > Sending a test message to see if this works.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 10:36 AM Johnpaul Humphrey wrote:
> Works for me!
>
Thanks. All email lists hosted on SourceForge were "stuck" over the
weekend. When I entered my problem ticket, I saw other projects had
done the same. Looki
> Sending a test message to see if this works.
Works for me!
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
The SourceForge email list server seems to be down. Sending a test message
to see if this works.
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Received.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Jim Hall wrote:
> Thanks, everyone. Glad to know the email lists are working again.
>
> But to be on the safe side, I'll wait to start any major discussion for
> another day.
>
>
>
Thanks, everyone. Glad to know the email lists are working again.
But to be on the safe side, I'll wait to start any major discussion for
another day.
--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solu
Yes...
Op 22 jul. 2015 02:43 schreef "Jim Hall" :
> Hi everyone
>
> It's Tuesday, and SF says list archives are back. Just checking if list
> services are back too.
>
> Did anyone get this email?
>
>
> --
> Don't Limit You
Hi Jim,
I received it.
JimDavis
From: Jim Hall [mailto:jh...@freedos.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 9:22 AM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Freedos-devel] Test email
Hi everyone
It's Tuesday, and SF says list archives are back. Just checking if list
ser
Yes!
--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Business
Hi everyone
It's Tuesday, and SF says list archives are back. Just checking if list
services are back too.
Did anyone get this email?
--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide yo
On 7/21/2014 5:07 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Ralf Quint wrote:
>> Sorry for making a test, but it seems my previous emails never made it
>> to the list (or I am getting censored :-( )
> I don't know why that would be. Speaking only as an uninformed end
> user, I
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Ralf Quint wrote:
>
> Sorry for making a test, but it seems my previous emails never made it
> to the list (or I am getting censored :-( )
I don't know why that would be. Speaking only as an uninformed end
user, I don't know what anti-spam software would even
Sorry for making a test, but it seems my previous emails never made it
to the list (or I am getting censored :-( )
Ralf
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
-
:)
- Original Message -
From: "dos386"
To: ;
;
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:49 AM
Subject: [Freedos-devel] test
> as Eric suggested :-D
>
> --
> Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30
as Eric suggested :-D
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables
unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine
for externally facing serve
At 01:43 AM 8/19/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
>e> are disabled by INT 15, and restored by iret) You miss, that only
>recent releases of EMM386 do now respect original flags value on the stack
>- previous releases just directly manipulate IF flag and do "retf 2". te>
>So I assume th
Hi!
17-Авг-2006 21:52 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Michael Devore
:
te> I don't know why pushf/cli/popf got even in there, as for any
te> selfrespecting BIOS, this should have *exactly* no effect (interrupts
te> are disabled by INT 15, and restored by iret)
You miss, that only re
Hi!
17-Авг-2006 12:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> Unless found precise reason, there are no assurance, that your patch
>>fixes (not masks) anything and not damages anything else.
MD> It wouldn't damage anything else, but it might mask i
At 09:52 PM 8/17/2006 +0200, tom ehlert wrote:
> > I was a bit worried about the return address getting munged myself,
> > but the fact of AX modification is a good reason for why the BIOS bug
> > didn't keep biting, and the first patched worked.
>
>the 'first patch' actually was the original - fro
Hello Michael,
> I was a bit worried about the return address getting munged myself,
> but the fact of AX modification is a good reason for why the BIOS bug
> didn't keep biting, and the first patched worked.
the 'first patch' actually was the original - from the good old times
before Michael en
At 12:49 PM 8/17/2006 -0500, I wrote:
> > And? Why return address isn't damaged? Let me ask again:
> >
> >stack:
> >| ret address |
> >+-+
> >| pushf | <- tom thinks, this value damaged
> >+-+
> >| INT15 call |
> >
> >stack after tom's patch:
> >
> >stack:
> >| r
>> there's one possible solution to this, and I seem to remember
>> that at some time some variant of (MS/DR/NOVELL/...)DOS had the following
>> solution:
>>
>>look at first few instructions in program (or typical header
>>values etc.)
>>if this looks like a brain dead old exepacker, r
> there's one possible solution to this, and I seem to remember
> that at some time some variant of (MS/DR/NOVELL/...)DOS had the following
> solution:
>
>look at first few instructions in program (or typical header
>values etc.)
>if this looks like a brain dead old exepacker, relocate
Hello Michael,
>> Which packer (and/or programs, which packed by this/these packers)?
> Very old QuickBASIC program. I actually don't know if it's packed or
> exactly what it's doing in its little pinhead, but it does use segment
> wrapping. Shortly after startup the debugger showed it
>
At 02:18 PM 8/17/2006 +0400, you wrote:
> >>looks like sometimes someone damages something on the stack, which
> >>goes unnoticed most of the time
>
> Unless found precise reason, there are no assurance, that your patch
>fixes (not masks) anything and not damages anything else.
It wouldn't da
>that's all I know. this ugly patch solves the issue.
>>> But how you found this?!
te>> by trying these 2 versions. one works, the other doesn't
> But how you found working version?!
with luck. I had an old version that worked.
Tom
---
Hi!
17-Авг-2006 14:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to "Arkady V.Belousov"
:
that's all I know. this ugly patch solves the issue.
>> But how you found this?!
te> by trying these 2 versions. one works, the other doesn't
But how you found working version?!
>> And what you fou
>>> >> Do you mean "flags, _saved on the stack above given code_"?
>>> >> And, if so, then why flags are damaged, but return value, which was lies
>>> >> on place of flags (relative SP) are not damaged, if you comment out
>>> >> "pushf"?
>>>that's all I know. this ugly patch solves the issue.
Hi!
17--2006 03:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> >> May you explain here and/or, better, in comments in source, why
>> >> decreasing SP solves issues (and which issues there are)?
>> >>>Only plausible explanation: THIS BIOS damages (some
At 09:20 AM 8/17/2006 +0200, tom ehlert wrote:
> >> May you explain here and/or, better, in comments in source, why
> >> decreasing SP solves issues (and which issues there are)? >>Only
> >> plausible explanation: >>THIS BIOS damages (sometimes ?) the
> >> flags; Do you mean "flags, _sav
>> May you explain here and/or, better, in comments in source, why
>> decreasing SP solves issues (and which issues there are)? >>Only
>> plausible explanation: >>THIS BIOS damages (sometimes ?) the
>> flags; Do you mean "flags, _saved on the stack above given code_"?
>> And, if so, t
At 06:19 AM 8/17/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> May you explain here and/or, better, in comments in source, why
> decreasing SP solves issues (and which issues there are)? >>Only
> plausible explanation: >>THIS BIOS damages (sometimes ?) the
> flags; Do you mean "flags, _save
Hi!
16-Авг-2006 13:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
MD> At 03:21 PM 8/16/2006 +0200, tom ehlert wrote:
>>'solved' the original bug (sort of) by changing
>>disable_enable_a20_BIOS:
>> ;pushf
>> ;cli
>> shr ah,1; ah
At 03:21 PM 8/16/2006 +0200, tom ehlert wrote:
>'solved' the original bug (sort of) by changing
>
>disable_enable_a20_BIOS:
> ;pushf
> ;cli
>
> shr ah,1; ah to 0 or 1
> mov al,24h
> xchgah,al ; ax == 2400h to turn off, 2401h to turn on
>
I've uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/emm386/ the file
himem324.zip, containing a revised HIMEM executable and source file changed
from version 3.23.
This is an alternative version of HIMEM I'm making available for
testing. It is only slightly modified from the previous versi
Testing ...
Erwin
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 ba
test
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay
тест
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay
test
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://
This is a test, please ignore.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD
Everybody is being quiet...
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote:
List quiet or...?
Aitor
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live u
> List quiet or...?
> Aitor
Or all are waiting for "Urbi et Orbi" ...
Erwin
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to
List quiet or...?
Aitor
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
test
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
Hello all,
I've put online a new bootdisk with which I, and you, can easily
experiment. Download it from:
http://fdos.org/ripcord/beta9-final/test/testing.zip [274KB, 1.44MB
unzipped]
just select option 1. Never mind the menu, just did not get rid of it,
and thus you see bug 1.
I see some stran
Hi!
subj
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.co
> ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads
A: Test machine 440BX 512 MB (brand A)
B: Test machine 440BX 256 MB (brand B)
- OpenDos 7.01:
- OpenDos 7.01 (DrDos) EMM386 NOEMS on A:
Reported INT 67h value of 025C:006B
EMS function 40h, Get Status, failed
EMS function 41h, Get Page Frame, failed, addr
At 01:54 PM 3/14/2004 +0200, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
>>ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads
>
>Thank you, now it works! Here are my test results. See below.
>(MS-DOS 7.1 and HIMEM.SYS 3.95 from Windows 98 Second Edition
>IBM Expanded Memory Manager 386 Version 4.50 from PC-DOS 2000
>Command line
ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads
Thank you, now it works! Here are my test results. See below.
(MS-DOS 7.1 and HIMEM.SYS 3.95 from Windows 98 Second Edition
IBM Expanded Memory Manager 386 Version 4.50 from PC-DOS 2000
Command line: /I=B000-B7FF /I=F000-F6FF /X=CC00-D0FF NOEMS V)
Reported INT
ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads
At 12:33 PM 3/14/2004 +0300, you wrote:
>Hi!
>
>13-íÁÒ-2004 15:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>MD> internals, I need to check the values that MS-DOS or DR-DOS returns for EMS
>MD> Accordingly, I have uploaded to ftp://ftp
Hi!
13-Мар-2004 15:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MD> internals, I need to check the values that MS-DOS or DR-DOS returns for EMS
MD> Accordingly, I have uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware/downloads a file
MD> called EMSREP.ZIP, with the EMSREP.EXE report prog
Because of the goofy and mostly undocumented nature of various EMS internals, I need
to check the values that MS-DOS or DR-DOS returns for EMS calls to make sure VCPI/EMS
code in FreeDOS EMM386 is working close to general standards. I'd like anyone who has
a MS-DOS or DR-DOS machine where they
Hi!
I receive next report:
__O\_/_\_/O__
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
(reason: 558 Your network address is blacklisted, this means that your
network range or your server is in our...ing to send
This is a test - please ignore.
I just put some new filters in place on my personal email. Wanted to
make sure I'm not blocking the wrong thing.
--
_
This email message has been automatically encrypted using ROT-26.
---
54 matches
Mail list logo
