Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

Also: I'm also planning to do some general cleanup on the website. I'm not happy with some changes I made when I made the last update to the website earlier this year. I don't think these changes will be very big, but you'll notice some changes. The biggest changes will be on the "Download" page

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

Based on feedback here, I'll plan to do a few things to focus the communication to fewer, more actively-used channels: * I'll retire the freedos-kernel email list. (I'll make it read-only, and not mention it on the "Forums" page.) All kernel development discussion should go to freedos-devel. *

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

Hi Jeremy, > At some point I may redo the kernel repository on GitHub, the current one was > initially from a released source and not git to svn conversation so is > missing history before that release. Archiving current one and doing the git > <-> svn sync with a new one looses the link to

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

On Fri, May 15, 2020, 4:09 PM Robert Riebisch wrote: > Hi Jim, > > > Email ... > > And we also have the Wiki for documentation and other information, and > > the bug tracker on SourceForge to track bugs and feature requests. > > And we can't keep up with fixing things and updating items. :-/

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

On Fri, 15 May 2020, Robert Riebisch wrote: IRC I don't use it, but if I understand right, it's a quick way to post questions w/o registering anywhere. Yeah. I've actually been running a small IRC network for over a decade, and maintain some of its infrastructure. -uso.

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

Hi Jim, > Email lists > > We obviously use the freedos-devel and freedos-user email lists. > But the freedos-kernel list is not used very much. Looking at the > archive, this hasn't seen more than a few emails per *year* in the > last several years. What if we

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

Hi Jim, glad to hear from you about this :-) > But mostly it's because I hadn't *removed* lesser-used communication > channels from the website. So we have all these places linked from > the "Forums" page, but some places are not very populated. People already *on* the lesser-used channels are

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

On Friday, May 15, 2020 1:28 PM, Jim Hall jh...@freedos.org wrote: > ... > My comments/questions on a few ways we communicate: > ... My comments on your comments: :D > Email lists > https://www.freedos.org/forums/ > We obviously use the freedos-devel and freedos-user email lists. > But the

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:50 PM Eric Auer wrote: [..] > So, what to do? Some type of feature freeze? Maybe a > roadmap of what stuff we want to port from fdpp to > FreeDOS, or how to get fdpp to run on hardware? For > that one would have to know which stuff fdpp improved > but even that

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

Hi, > this is completely new to me; was this ever discussed on the msiling > list? I find this tremendosuly useful as it really eases the > communication between virtual DOS machines and the host. Bochs has the vvfat HDD mode, btw. > you probably forgot the famous FreeDOS channel >

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:50 PM Eric Auer wrote: > > > Hi Rugxulo (and Jim!) > > >> https://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/svn/HEAD/tree/kernel/ ... > > > AFAIK, the maintainer is Jeremy Davis, ... > > https://github.com/PerditionC/fdkernel > > I hope there is sufficient advertisement of the github

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

https://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/svn/HEAD/tree/kernel/ ... >> >>> AFAIK, the maintainer is Jeremy Davis, ... >>> https://github.com/PerditionC/fdkernel >> >> I hope there is sufficient advertisement of the github link, Jim? > The latest commit to fdkernel points to

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

Hi Eric, >>> https://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/svn/HEAD/tree/kernel/ ... > >> AFAIK, the maintainer is Jeremy Davis, ... >> https://github.com/PerditionC/fdkernel > > I hope there is sufficient advertisement of the github link, Jim? The latest commit to fdkernel points to

Re: [Freedos-devel] stuck / forked freedos core component development!

Hi Rugxulo (and Jim!) >> https://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/svn/HEAD/tree/kernel/ ... > AFAIK, the maintainer is Jeremy Davis, ... > https://github.com/PerditionC/fdkernel I hope there is sufficient advertisement of the github link, Jim? >>> Is kernel development officially dead? How about