You can release it, but I want to put it together with other updates and
finally generate v1.1.
Pat
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Bart Oldeman
bartolde...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi,
thanks to Damien Guibouret the problem with file corruption in kernel
2039 finally seems to be
Folks,
Can you review the bug tracker at
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=5109atid=105109 and let me know
what's valid. missing, etc.? I'm trying to plan/assign bug fixes.
Pat Villani
Project Coordinator
It's still active of sorts. I'm in the process of defining the road map,
and input like this is very useful.
We have FDAPM, but I'm not familiar with your GPU, and have no idea if it
works with FDAPM. I don't know if there's anyone else that has an answer
for you.
Pat
Project Coordinator
On
There is work going on, but noe estimate to completion.
I would tend to agree, use 2038 until it is fixed.
Pat
Project Coordinator
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:03 AM, dos386 dos...@gmail.com wrote:
I have prepeared a new FreeDOS distribution for REAL USE in the field
Is there anyone working
Hello Alain,
I probably missed it. What is different about your distribution? f it is a
major imrpvement to what we have, why not distribute it as a FreeDOS
distribution?
Pat
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Alain Mouette ala...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi all,
first of all, Happy ne year :)
Is
You need to go to
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel, as shown on the
bottom of the email, and follow instructions on that page.
Pat
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:39 PM, m...@pixoled.com wrote:
UNSUBSCRIBE
Allow me to make this perfectly clear: the FreeDOS kernel * IS NOT PUBLIC
DOMAIN* and will never be. Please do not spread such rumors.
Just to make mys elf perfectly clear, the FreeDOS kernel *IS NOT PUBLIC
DOMAIN*. In fact, unless a package has documentation that says it is public
domain, make
Thank you. I will follow through on that.
Pat
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote:
Hi Pat,
Allow me to make this perfectly clear: the FreeDOS kernel
*IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN* and will never be.
Please do not spread such rumors.
I do not see such rumors
There's quite a bit of interest in producing version 1.1 on some of
our other lists. As a result, I'm putting out a call for volunteers.
I know when it comes to the kernel developers, there has been
continual development activity and I'm hoping that you will continue
to help with version 1.1.
My
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Tom Ehlert t...@drivesnapshot.de wrote:
*** SNIP ***
just wondering, why
a) this wasn't advertised on this list and
Oversight.
b) why there isn't a 386-fat32 binary available (hardly anyone even
knows where he might see a real 8086 machine), and the 386
Just in case you missed it.
Pat
-- Forwarded message --
From: MegaBrutal megabru...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:26 AM
Subject: [Freedos-user] Thanks for the new kernel, 2039
To: freedos-u...@lists.sourceforge.net
Dear FreeDOS developers,
I'm a humble user (and fan)
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Bart
Oldemanbartolde...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
*** SNIP ***
Or you can try the new 2039 release -- see sf.net/projects/freedos but
not yet officially announced.
Having trouble logging into ibiblio. When I get it uploaded there,
I'll make the
Hi Folks,
Sonmeone is having trouble and it's up on one of the yahoo sites:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090730064519AAdKTRN
Can someone here have a look at the question and tell them about drivers and
config.sys?
Thanks.
Pat
Thank you.
Pat
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Jackie McBride able...@gmail.com wrote:
Pat, I'm taking care of it. It's the least I can do to help u guys.
On 7/31/09, Pat Villani p...@monmouth.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Sonmeone is having trouble and it's up on one of the yahoo sites
I've been seeing reports of FreeDOS crashing on machines it's installed on.
I've also gotten some direct email from people about applications that ship
with FreeDOS and then there are problems. I guess with the wider use of our
little projects, we'll see and here more of these.
What I'm doing
Jeremy,
Do you have a binary of what you will be tagging? I'd like to test it.
Pat
P.S., I can't build it because my development notebook is dying.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Kenneth J. Davis jere...@fdos.org wrote:
Assuming no objections, I will tag and make available kernel 2039
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote:
*** SNIP ***
Pat: Jeremy wrote earlier that current SVN binaries are always at:
http://fdos.org/kernel/ke386f32.zip - 386+, FAT32 enabled kernel
http://fdos.org/kernel/ke86f16.zip - 8086+, FAT16/12 only kernel
now
As FreeDOS project coordinator, just email here and you'll contact me. So
you just did ;-)
Way back in the dark ages, Jim and I had a discussion about licensing and we
pretty much settled on GPL. These licensing discussions continue today as
well. I won't bore you with the details, but we
Over the weekend, the ISP that handles our DNS did an upgrade and
unfortunately it didn't happen smoothly, so they are effectively down right
now. Based on what we know, this may take some time before they can correct
it.
Until this is fixed, www.freedos.org will not be resolvable in DNS, so it
I would like to thank all the folks who have worked very hard to
produce this latest kernel. Their effort is very much appreciated by
myself and all the people who continue to use FreeDOS in various
applications.
I am looking forward to using this new kernel and updating the distribution.
Pat
Folks,
I am not as up to date on the changes as you may be. I'm looking for
a volunteer (or volunteers) to update history.txt for 2038 and 2039.
When I get the updated files, I'll follow through and get them on the
web sites.
Pat
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de
If half as much effort went into the code that has gone into this
thread, we'd have rewritten the kernel several times over.
Since I'm wrong about the kernel(?), let me put it to you this way. I
want to put out a new release, FreeDOS v1.1 and get a plan in place.
In 50 words or less, who is
This sounds liuke a good strategy.
Pat
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:07 PM, ibid...@lavabit.com wrote:
Hi Pat,
I would say 2038 as default, 2037 (including winkrnl) as option--unless
2039 shows up first (doesn't look likely). If 2039 gets something
worthwhile, 1.11 is an option.
Thank you,
I'll take care of it tomorrow.
Pat
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Kenneth J. Davis jere...@fdos.org wrote:
Kernel 2038 tagged and available at http://www.fdos.org/kernel/latest/
Someone with access, please upload to ibiblio and release on SF.
Please test and report any new issues to the
OK, let me chime in on this. Jim and I had several conversations on
topics like this before I took over. I want to share the current
thinking.
We, as a group, have made a significant impact on the open source
community and computing in general. This is something we need to keep
in mind as we
Nope, I'm not doing anything other than trying to gather enough
information with respect to project status to try to come up with a
road map and possibly plan release 1.1.
I have made *NO* decisions.
Pat
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
***
+ hours per week
all last summer in oder to meet schedule commitments.
I'd love to be more active. Instead, best I can do is the occasional
comment. *Sigh*
Pat
Interim FreeDOS Kernel Maintainer wrote:
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
11--2005 12:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pat Villani) wrote to
freedos
With all the unstable versions and private branches going around, what
is the official kernel?
Pat
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun
That's really bad practice. The reason that it's there is so if, by
reason of a bug or hardware failure of any sort, return_user() does
really return, you will have bug that will be a nightmare to find. For
the savings of less than 10 bytes, it's not worth the risk.
Pat
Arkady V.Belousov
and had no break at the
end. The code fell into the next case and the system fell like a set
dominoes.
I'm not maintaining the kernel, so just my $0.02 -- which is worth less
in Euros ;-)
Pat
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
5--2005 08:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pat Villani) wrote to
freedos-kernel
The simple fact is that the f_nodes structure is not needed at all.
Before I left the group several years ago, I was planning to rewrite the
kernel specifically to eliminate f_nodes and move to SFT. The reason
was precisely the incompatibility between this kernel and other programs
such as
It's the original data structure used for file systems. It was designed
originally as a structure that contained a semaphore, file system type
identifier, and a union for file system data. It was simplified for the
original DOS-C/FreeDOS kernel, and changes have been made by myself and
32 matches
Mail list logo
