2009/5/21 Eric Auer :
> Not really - I think it would be tricky to put the config
> variables in something that all used MAKE versions can deal
> with directly, as opposed to having both a BAT and a MAK?
There used to be (a long time ago) both a config.bat and a config.mak
(for DOS!), where config
Hi Bart,
>> svn diff -r1386:1388
>> gives a diff of 14 kilobytes, 12 files modified,
>> 46 lines changed, 170 lines added. Quite a lot.
> Do you think the change is too big?
Too big to say "read the diff" instead of explaining
what and how you changed, but not too big as patch :-)
Many of your
2009/5/21 Eric Auer :
> That is the point...
>
> svn diff -r1386:1388
>
> gives a diff of 14 kilobytes, 12 files modified,
> 46 lines changed, 170 lines added. Quite a lot.
> Okay okay I can analyze the patch myself... :-( Some explanations
> from the author would have saved some time here, of cou
Hi Bart,
> Can you be more specific? Did you look at the svn diff at all?
That is the point...
svn diff -r1386:1388
gives a diff of 14 kilobytes, 12 files modified,
46 lines changed, 170 lines added. Quite a lot.
Okay okay I can analyze the patch myself... :-( Some explanations
from the auth
Hi Eric,
> Interesting :-) How does it work (in other words, what was the
> trick to make it possible) and how do the "config bat" settings
> work in this context? :-)
Can you be more specific? Did you look at the svn diff at all?
Bart
--
Hi Bart :-)
> Jim reinstated SVN write access so I committed a patch that I have
> used internally in a not so clean fashion for a long time:
> cross-compiling from Linux using Open Watcom. The reason why: well it
> is more convenient and quicker (less than 2 vs. 20+ seconds here) to
> cross-comp
Hi,
Jim reinstated SVN write access so I committed a patch that I have
used internally in a not so clean fashion for a long time:
cross-compiling from Linux using Open Watcom. The reason why: well it
is more convenient and quicker (less than 2 vs. 20+ seconds here) to
cross-compile than fire up DO
