Re: [Freedos-kernel] ludivmul.inc

2004-07-22 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 22--2004 09:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: My bugfix-list for umb_init() includes 7 positions. How I may isolate bugfixes from new umb_init() edition?! BO Try to optimize something else, ?! I _rework_ umb_init(). If its better with original

Re: [Freedos-kernel] ludivmul.inc

2004-07-22 Thread tom ehlert
Hello Arkady, - may/should be `static dmatch Dmatch;' in fcbfns.c moved to stack in the FcbFindFirstNext() (as in other functions in fcbfns.c)? I' abolutely NOT sure about that. you are right - it doesn't seem to make much sense. I have some dark memory, that I changed that (back in the

Re: [Freedos-kernel] ludivmul.inc

2004-07-21 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote: 20-éÀÌ-2004 00:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: BO encouraging... In any case, I appreciate that a bug was found in BO ludivmul.inc; the same bug was in fact present in the 64 bit version I BO adapted it from!

Re: [Freedos-kernel] ludivmul.inc

2004-07-19 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Bart Oldeman wrote: I'm still not sure if and when I really return, the archives aren't really encouraging... In any case, I appreciate that a bug was found in ludivmul.inc; the same bug was in fact present in the 64 bit version I adapted it from! Well I notified the

Re: [Freedos-kernel] ludivmul.inc

2004-07-19 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Bart Oldeman schreef: I'm sorry but I simply don't have the time to go through all the other patches. If they were reduced to just bug fixes I'll promise that I'll have another look though -- I still monitor the mailing list every now and then. Guys *any* project that wants to be close to a 1.0

Re: [Freedos-kernel] ludivmul.inc

2004-07-19 Thread tom ehlert
Hi Bart, In any case, I appreciate that a bug was found in ludivmul.inc so do I What I don't like is that the fix from Arkady (for the 1000th time...) does 3 things at the same time -- formatting, fixing, and optimizing. neither do I like that. This makes it impossible to see where things

Re: [Freedos-kernel] ludivmul.inc

2004-07-19 Thread Michael Devore
At 12:55 AM 7/20/2004 +1200, Bart Oldeman wrote: I'm sorry but I simply don't have the time to go through all the other patches. If they were reduced to just bug fixes I'll promise that I'll have another look though -- I still monitor the mailing list every now and then. Guys *any* project that

Re: [Freedos-kernel] ludivmul.inc

2004-07-19 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Arkady V.Belousov schreef: Hi! 19--2004 16:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: BB to work out his changes. At a given moment, he should probably issue a BB code-freeze and then make stuff more readable/review-able May you point, what in my code isn't readable (or,

Re: [Freedos-kernel] ludivmul.inc

2004-07-19 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 19--2004 10:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: MD I am glad someone said this that nicely. I have been stunned that the vast MD number of relative last-minute pre-1.0 kernel changes I begun to (more deeply) work on kernel only when Bart quits his

Re: [Freedos-kernel] ludivmul.inc

2004-07-19 Thread tom ehlert
BB replace readable by understandable for inexperienced C programmers Unimportant. here I have to agree - kernel programming is nothing for inexperienced programmers, and will never be. Note: this is myth. well - my private email archives show that 'arkadifying code' is used as

Re: [Freedos-kernel] ludivmul.inc

2004-07-19 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 19--2004 22:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: BB replace readable by understandable for inexperienced C programmers Unimportant. te here I have to agree - kernel programming is nothing for inexperienced te programmers, and will never be.