MONTHLY REMINDER FOR THE FREEDOS MAILING LISTS
Hello, and welcome to the FreeDOS mailing list!
If you have been a list member for some time, then you can skip this
as you should be familiar with the rules by now.
--
The FreeDO
Hi again,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> But I agree, in theory, that JEMMEX shouldn't be preferred or
> suggested without a good reason. But that's not my decision for FD 1.2
> (and I forget offhand what Jerome uses, I haven't downloaded any
> recent prereleases, too preoccu
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Abe Mishler wrote:
>
>> On Jun 30, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>>
>> If JEMMEX is your only problem, then you have no problems.
>
> This idea has appeared before in this thread and it is a relief to hear it
> echoed.
> Perhaps a disclaimer like this is
Hi,
I'm no expert, so I've only lightly dabbled.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Abe Mishler wrote:
>
> I see it is back up now.
Like I said before, the compiler has been around (even heavily
developed) for 12 years! It's no toy but instead a mature tool at this
point.
> I had been doing some
Hi,
> On Jun 30, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Abe Mishler wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/29/2016 1:03 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>>
>> On the page that you sent regarding QEMU Binaries for Windows, it says:
>> "QEMU for Windows is experimental software and might
I see it is back up now. I had been doing some reading on the pros/cons of
FreeBASIC vs QB64. Not looking to start a flame war here, but I had decided to
invest some time with FreeBASIC when the site went down. I thought perhaps that
was an early portent that I had picked the "wrong" compiler. I
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Abe Mishler wrote:
>
>> On 6/29/2016 1:03 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> On the page that you sent regarding QEMU Binaries for Windows, it says:
> "QEMU for Windows is experimental software and might contain even
> serious bugs, so use the binaries at your own risk."
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Abe Mishler wrote:
>
> Does anyone know the state of FreeBASIC? The site (http://freebasic.net)
> has been down for at least 2 days now. Has the project been shuttered?
I'm not in the loop and haven't heard anything privately, but I know
that I browsed there
Hi, to bring in some thoughts from off-list...
JEMMEX has a built-in HIMEM which apparently is known to have
problems when memory useable for XMS is discontinuous, which
happens quite often on modern (virtual) hardware.
The UMBPCI author tries hard to keep supporting modern chipsets
which can be
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Abe Mishler wrote:
> Does anyone know the state of FreeBASIC? The site (http://freebasic.net)
> has been down for at least 2 days now. Has the project been shuttered?
The Sourceforge back end is still up, and claims the last code update
was 4 days ago.
https://so
> I think FreeDOS in QEMU on linux is the way to go (for me, at this time).
Inspired by this thread I also looked into qemu (even installed it on my Mac).
Just in case you missed it:
There’s a great tutorial about running FreeDOS 1.1 in qemu.
Part three is all about networking. :-)
The author
Does anyone know the state of FreeBASIC? The site (http://freebasic.net)
has been down for at least 2 days now. Has the project been shuttered?
Thanks,
Abe
--
Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T P
Hi Rugxulo et al.,
On 6/29/2016 1:03 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Abe Mishler wrote:
>>
>> On 6/28/2016 7:55 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>>>
>>> I would recommend you (also) test under QEMU if you're that worried or
>>> want (potentially) better stability.
>>>
>> QEMU, wh
13 matches
Mail list logo
