Off Subject

2002-02-01 Thread George
Can anyone help me with a cranky max 6000? Thx George - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: performance issues

2002-02-01 Thread Kostas Kalevras
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, pavesi wrote: I have ~10k users and having some performance issues on my two FreeRadius 0.4 servers. I am using MySQL for radius accounting and LDAP as my authentication methods, along with CHAP. I get consistent messages of the type: Error: Dropping duplicate

Re: Thread issue - Possible fix

2002-02-01 Thread Eddie Stassen
I have been experiencing crashes as well under high accounting load (Solaris 7 , mysql accounting). It appears that the use of non thread-safe library functions are responsible for this. I have replaced all the localtime() and ctime() calls with their POSIX thread safe counterparts

Re: bind 192.168.1.1 to freeradius 0.4 problem

2002-02-01 Thread namor
Check your /etc/services - if it doesn't define ports for RADIUS, then it will use the default 1645, 1646. And portslave is assuming the new port of 1812. So, you have to change one of them to use the correct port; the addresses are fine. I'm using portslave to serve as replacement for

Re: Thread issue - Possible fix

2002-02-01 Thread Marcelo Ferreira
can you send the diff of all files that you fix ? []s Marcelo Ferreira Canbras TVA Cabo Ltda Canbras Acesso - STA Phone: +5511-4993-8728 - Original Message - From:

Re: postrgresql and operator field

2002-02-01 Thread aland
xiashao7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is any support of operator fileds for postgres? Yes, once you update the schema and the database. I downloaded and compiled freeradius snapshot, but it seems that db schema was changed only for mysql. Is any way to use operator fields with postgres? Has

Re: Thread issue - Possible fix

2002-02-01 Thread Eddie Stassen
At 12:33 PM 02/02/01 -0200, you wrote: can you send the diff of all files that you fix ? []s I don't have the time right now to make up the diffs (its Friday afternoon and 30 deg C outside :)), but I changed all the localtime ctime references in the following files: src/main/xlat.c

Re: Thread issue - Possible fix

2002-02-01 Thread aland
Eddie Stassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears that the use of non thread-safe library functions are responsible for this. Uh, yeah. Why didn't I think of that. Sorry... I don't know how applicable these changes are to other OS's (Linux), but perhaps someone running FR on linux

Re: Off Subject

2002-02-01 Thread Mike Cathey
cranky? George wrote: Can anyone help me with a cranky max 6000? Thx George - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Off Subject

2002-02-01 Thread George
getting users connecting at 26.4 frame errors and controlled slips Mike Cathey wrote: cranky? George wrote: Can anyone help me with a cranky max 6000? Thx George - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List

Delegate Auth.

2002-02-01 Thread Julio Faerman
How can i define the following rule in free radius : "Try to authenticate user XXX. If not found in this radius, try radius W.X.Y.Z" hugs to all ... julio

Re: Delegate Auth.

2002-02-01 Thread aland
Julio Faerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can i define the following rule in free radius : Try to authenticate user XXX. If not found in this radius, try radius = W.X.Y.Z You have to be careful, but it can be done. See 'doc/configurable_failover' You've got to set up all of the

Re: ips assignments outside of pool range

2002-02-01 Thread aland
Lee W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right now I have the 3com handling the pools not FreeRadius. I was told on this list that Freeradius can't handle a upper limit on address pools, that you can set a start limit with Framed-IP-Address, and it will assign up from said IP so I should use my

Re: performance issues

2002-02-01 Thread aland
pavesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have ~10k users and having some performance issues on my two FreeRadius 0.4 servers. Most performance issues can be traced to external databases or DNS lookups. If you're only using the 'users' file, then the server should be able to handle 1000's of

Re: bind 192.168.1.1 to freeradius 0.4 problem

2002-02-01 Thread aland
Peter Santiago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Feb 1 13:22:58 psinergybbs port[S100]: radius@[192.168.1.1]1812 not responding I have already used the -i ipaddr argument for freeradius Attaced below is my current freeradius and portslave config( Please bear with me, as I am only starting to

Re: Thread issue - Possible fix

2002-02-01 Thread Frank Cusack
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:52:49AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eddie Stassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears that the use of non thread-safe library functions are responsible for this. [...] The changes MUSt be made for safety. I'll take a look at doing some of the work over the

Re: Thread issue - Possible fix

2002-02-01 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eddie Stassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears that the use of non thread-safe library functions are responsible for this. Uh, yeah. Why didn't I think of that. Sorry... Well, you should be able to link against thread-safe

FreeRadius or Cistron?

2002-02-01 Thread Michael Letchworth
Please explain the relationship that freeradius and Cistron have? I know cistron started but he has not enough time to devote to the project "which I totally understand" because of his personal live and work. Now, I have read that a couple of other guys started freeradius using the cistron