Re: Fragmented EAP frames was My problem with PEAP

2003-11-24 Thread Alan DeKok
Bill Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I grabbed the latest snapshot on friday. Recompiled. Reconfigured the default radiusd.conf file to use eap/peap. I am still seeing fragmented Access Challenge packets. However the first access challenge was not fragmented. The ones after that were.

Re: Fragmented EAP frames was My problem with PEAP

2003-11-24 Thread Bill Reid
Thanks Alan, Alan DeKok wrote: Bill Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I grabbed the latest snapshot on friday. Recompiled. Reconfigured the default radiusd.conf file to use eap/peap. I am still seeing fragmented Access Challenge packets. However the first access challenge was not

Fragmented EAP frames was My problem with PEAP

2003-11-23 Thread Bill Reid
Hmm, My other message did not make it through. Perhaps people are sick of hearing about this :) I grabbed the latest snapshot on friday. Recompiled. Reconfigured the default radiusd.conf file to use eap/peap. I am still seeing fragmented Access Challenge packets. However the first

Re: My problem with PEAP

2003-11-20 Thread William E Reid
Hey guys, I reconfigured from the default radiusd.conf file and did this test again with the same strange results from peap. I could certainly be doing something stupid and would appreciate any further feedback. I have included my radiusd.conf file and a new tcpdump from the server.

Re: My problem with PEAP

2003-11-20 Thread Alan DeKok
William E Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I reconfigured from the default radiusd.conf file and did this test again with the same strange results from peap. I really don't know what to tell you. Are you *sure* it's using the 'radiusd.conf' file you think it's using? Try using a fresh

Re: My problem with PEAP

2003-11-20 Thread Bill Reid
Alan DeKok wrote: William E Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I reconfigured from the default radiusd.conf file and did this test again with the same strange results from peap. I really don't know what to tell you. Are you *sure* it's using the 'radiusd.conf' file you think it's using?

Re: My problem with PEAP

2003-11-20 Thread Alan DeKok
Bill Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I promiss I am using that radiusd.conf. I started from scratch this time. Did you start from the DEFAULT radiusd.conf? If it doesn't work in the default configuration, then something else is wrong, and no amount of editing the default configuration will

My problem with PEAP

2003-11-19 Thread Bill Reid
Hey everyone, I continue to have a problem using peap with freeradius-snapshot-20031110. From what I have read about EAP, and from my discussions with others on this list, I believe I am seeing a problem from freeradius. Please correct me if I am wrong. According to the documentation in

Re: My problem with PEAP

2003-11-19 Thread Michael Griego
Umm... dumb question, but you don't have eap listed in the authenticate section of your radiusd.conf file twice do you? --Mike On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 12:31, Bill Reid wrote: Hey everyone, I continue to have a problem using peap with freeradius-snapshot-20031110. From what I have read

Re: My problem with PEAP

2003-11-19 Thread Bill Reid
I am asking the dumb questions here! No I don't. thanks Mike. -=Bill Michael Griego wrote: Umm... dumb question, but you don't have eap listed in the authenticate section of your radiusd.conf file twice do you? --Mike On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 12:31, Bill Reid wrote: Hey everyone, I continue

Re: My problem with PEAP

2003-11-19 Thread Alan DeKok
Bill Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I continue to have a problem using peap with freeradius-snapshot-20031110. From what I have read about EAP, and from my discussions with others on this list, I believe I am seeing a problem from freeradius. I've looked at your packet trace, and there

Re: My problem with PEAP

2003-11-19 Thread Michael Griego
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 13:09, Alan DeKok wrote: From the debug output, it looks like you've managed to make the server call the EAP module *twice* for the request, during the authenticate stage. I have no clue how you managed to do this, but it's definitely wrong. That's exactly what I'm