Lance Haig wrote:
> I posted my debug output to the list in another mail but I will add it to
> the end of this mail so they two are on the same page as it were.
What you posted earlier was a *tiny* portion of the debug output. And
the email I'm replying to contains no debug output.
> The docu
Hi,
> would recommend a review of the docs tomake sure it is easier to follow for
> people then your argument would be valid.
personally I foudn the docs weak when I first started with FreeRADIUS 0.x - but
then
have sicne then learnt everything from the actual config files and the man
pages.
(
HI Alan,
Thanks for the response mine are inline
> Well... nothing in the server magically changes it's behavior on a
> certain day. *Something* changed.
I agree and I am having a hard time finding what.
>
> And... what does the debug output say?
I posted my debug output to the list
Lance Haig wrote:
> Thanks for the response On this particular server we have not run any
> updates to the software stack as it is our policy to only update at regular
> intervals so that we can catch these things.
Well... nothing in the server magically changes it's behavior on a
certain day.
Hi Alan,
Thanks for the response.
We do know about the samba update and it was the first thing I check when
the system broke. We have about 400 ubuntu vm's running on our environment
and we have not yet updated our corporate repo with this update as we have
not tested it yet.
I checked the winbi
Hi C.J.
Thanks for the tip. We do run out config in Git and it has not changed since it
was configured about 2 months ago, this is what is baffling me.
The windows servers were not changed (well that is what the windows admins have
informed us@)
Thanks
Lance
On 15/09/2010 21:10, "C.J. Adams-
Hi Ken,
Thanks for the response On this particular server we have not run any
updates to the software stack as it is our policy to only update at regular
intervals so that we can catch these things.
I only sent the e-mail to the list after spending the day in freeradius -X
and -Xx to see if I can
Hi,
> We have implemented a freeradius server on ubuntu 10.04 connecting to AD on
> windows 2003 to allow our users to auth against for wirless access.
>
> This morning it all broke. And we don’t know why.
okay. a not so wild stab in the dark.
yesterday or day before a SAMBA security issue wa
I've found that keeping config file history using RCS or git to be very
useful. It's saved me a bunch of headache with bind, apache, sendmail
and freeradius. If you'd like some tips, I'm happy to oblige either
on-list or off, depending on whether the regulars consider it OT.
Cheers,
C.J.
On We
Many times this is caused by a software update to the system.
To figure out where the problem lies, you will need to follow
the very well documented procedure for debugging freeradius
if you do not have logs of what was updated on the system so
you can rollback the update(s).
Cheers,
Ken
On Wed,
Hi,
We have implemented a freeradius server on ubuntu 10.04 connecting to AD on
windows 2003 to allow our users to auth against for wirless access.
This morning it all broke. And we don’t know why.
So I started looking to build a new server to fault find.
I am trying to find some documentation
Alan,
One other point. The SQL queries we have are already customized, and
connected. We need to change the connection point. So I need to rewrite
them to do that.
Regards:jamie
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Alan,
> My problem is that I have to rewrite the SQL code to go fetch the
> right databases.
I don't see why.
>> Because the guy who wrote it originally wrote it wrong. I need more
functionality.
I looked back at what you wrote, I know what you said to do, no problem.
However, because of my
"Jamie Thain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My problem is that I have to rewrite the SQL code to go fetch the right
> databases.
I don't see why.
> After I need to be able to have AVPairs answered back to set speed and
> things, and there is a custom database, (billing software) that I need
> to
March 12, 2004 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Connecting the dots
"Jamie Thain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the help. How does the Cisco authenticate then to my SQL
> server. This is the part I am missing?
It doesn't. That's the po
"Jamie Thain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the help. How does the Cisco authenticate then to my SQL
> server. This is the part I am missing?
It doesn't. That's the point. Even in 0.4, it didn't authenticate
to the SQL server.
Q: Do you really want all of your users to have accoun
Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Connecting the dots
"Jamie Thain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Problem. I don't understand how 'authentication' gets passed through
> radiusd.conf and onto SQL config.
"Jamie Thain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Problem. I don't understand how 'authentication' gets passed through
> radiusd.conf and onto SQL config.
It doesn't.
> We tried a cart-blanc upgrade to 0.93
> but the 0.4 configs did not work, it complained about SQL not being an
> authentication type.
Hi All,
I have been reading through the documentation, and I am having a little
problem connecting some of the how-to's about FreeRadius 0.93. We have a
FreeRadius 0.4 that I inherited and I am reading the Radius O'Reilly
book, but still missing something.
Problem. I don't understand how 'authent
19 matches
Mail list logo
