On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:49:21AM +0100, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
I know it sounds a little clunky, but another option could be to use a
chain of detail readers/writers? If you set the primary detail reader load
factor to 100% the actual delay is likely to be pretty minimal...
So you'd
I settled on something similar to this. The outer server (processing
requests from the NAS) uses redundant-load-balance to write round-robin
across several (currently 5) detail files.
Five detail listeners (one for each detail file) then feed data to their
final destinations (remote
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Ideally there'd be a mechanism to remove Accounting-Requests after X number
of attempts at proxying. At the moment were using a request expiry time based
on the length of the period between the
request being received and it being proxied.
OK. I'll take a look at
Alan DeKok wrote:
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Ideally there'd be a mechanism to remove Accounting-Requests after X number
of attempts at proxying. At the moment were using a request expiry time
based on the length of the period between the
request being received and it being proxied.
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Sure, want me to open one for the unlang rcode inheritance bug too?
Yes, thanks.
Also you need to add the CSS files back in for the bug tracking system.
Currently bugzilla is trying to load them from
/bugzilla/skins/standard/global.css , but I get a 404 error when
Alan DeKok wrote:
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Sure, want me to open one for the unlang rcode inheritance bug too?
Yes, thanks.
Done.
Also you need to add the CSS files back in for the bug tracking system.
Currently bugzilla is trying to load them from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/08/2009 16:46, John Morrissey wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 01:59:00AM +0100, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/08/2009 21:15, John Morrissey wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:11:02AM +0200,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/08/2009 13:56, Alan DeKok wrote:
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
No, that'll get you the timestamp of when the packet was read back into the
server. The only way to calculate the original received timestamp is to
write the original
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/08/2009 18:17, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Ivan Kalikt...@kalik.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Arran
Cudbard-Bella.cudbard-b...@sussex.ac.uk wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
In that setup, where does
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
No, that'll get you the timestamp of when the packet was read back into the
server. The only way to calculate the original received timestamp is to write
the original Acct-Delay-Time into a custom
attribute (say Acct-Delay-Time-Orig), subtract that from the current
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 01:59:00AM +0100, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/08/2009 21:15, John Morrissey wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:11:02AM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
vol...@ufamts.ru wrote:
If home server does not respond, FR does not
Right. I was hoping there was a way for robust-proxy-accounting to respond
to the NAS when the proxy isn't responding, since the accounting request
has
been successfully processed (i.e., written to the detail log and saved
for
later proxying).
So it's still waiting to be processed - it
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Arran
Cudbard-Bella.cudbard-b...@sussex.ac.uk wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
In that setup, where does one get AcctStartTime and AcctStopTime values?
Or just use whatever functions are available in your scripting environment.
- is it from the NAS?
No, the
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Arran
Cudbard-Bella.cudbard-b...@sussex.ac.uk wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
In that setup, where does one get AcctStartTime and AcctStopTime
values?
Or just use whatever functions are available in your scripting
environment.
- is it from the NAS?
No,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Ivan Kalikt...@kalik.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Arran
Cudbard-Bella.cudbard-b...@sussex.ac.uk wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
In that setup, where does one get AcctStartTime and AcctStopTime
values?
Or just use whatever functions are
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Arran
Cudbard-Bella.cudbard-b...@sussex.ac.uk wrote:
On 21/08/2009 21:15, John Morrissey wrote:
Is decoupled-accounting (writing all detail to disk and replaying it
serialized with a detail listener) the only way to configure FreeRADIUS to
respond to the NAS?
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Arran
Cudbard-Bella.cudbard-b...@sussex.ac.uk wrote:
On 21/08/2009 21:15, John Morrissey wrote:
Is decoupled-accounting (writing all detail to disk and replaying it
serialized with a detail listener) the only way to
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Arran
Cudbard-Bella.cudbard-b...@sussex.ac.uk wrote:
On 21/08/2009 21:15, John Morrissey wrote:
Is decoupled-accounting (writing all detail to disk and replaying it
serialized with a detail listener) the only way to
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:11:02AM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
vol...@ufamts.ru wrote:
If home server does not respond, FR does not respond too - NAS repeats
request - FR writes request data to SQL again.
So... configure the server to respond. See the file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/08/2009 21:15, John Morrissey wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:11:02AM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
vol...@ufamts.ru wrote:
If home server does not respond, FR does not respond too - NAS repeats
request - FR writes request data to SQL again.
vol...@ufamts.ru wrote:
Alan DeKok wrote:
What do you mean duplicate records?
Alan DeKok.
If home server does not respond, FR does not respond too - NAS repeats
request - FR writes request data to SQL again.
So we got two problems:
1) repeating requests
2) NAS does not receive
vol...@ufamts.ru wrote:
If home server does not respond, FR does not respond too - NAS repeats
request - FR writes request data to SQL again.
So... configure the server to respond. See the file
raddb/sites-available/decoupled-accounting
So we got two problems:
1) repeating requests
2)
Alan DeKok wrote:
What do you mean duplicate records?
Alan DeKok.
If home server does not respond, FR does not respond too - NAS repeats
request - FR writes request data to SQL again.
So we got two problems:
1) repeating requests
2) NAS does not receive response
Or am I missing something?
-
I'm looking to process RADIUS accounting locally (SQL) as well as proxy it
to a remote host (to some third party software that also wants to receive a
copy of all accounting).
Is this possible with FreeRADIUS?
john
--
John Morrissey _o/\ __o
j...@horde.net
John Morrissey wrote:
I'm looking to process RADIUS accounting locally (SQL) as well as proxy it
to a remote host (to some third party software that also wants to receive a
copy of all accounting).
Is this possible with FreeRADIUS?
Yes. Just configure sql in the accounting section, *and*
John Morrissey wrote:
I'm looking to process RADIUS accounting locally (SQL) as well as proxy it
to a remote host (to some third party software that also wants to receive a
copy of all accounting).
Is this possible with FreeRADIUS?
Check sites-available/copy-acct-to-home-server
Best
Alan DeKok wrote:
Yes. Just configure sql in the accounting section, *and* configure
it to proxy.
Alan DeKok.
But if proxy does not respond, FR will insert duplicate records into SQL
table :( Is there some way to avoid it?
Best regards,
Denis Volkov
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
John Morrissey wrote:
I'm looking to process RADIUS accounting locally (SQL) as well as proxy
it to a remote host (to some third party software that also wants to
receive a copy of all accounting).
Yes. Just configure sql in
But if *proxy* does not respond, FR will insert duplicate records into SQL
table :( Is there some way to avoid it?
Sorry, of course I meant Home server does not respond
Best regards,
Denis Volkov
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 14/08/2009 20:43, vol...@ufamts.ru wrote:
John Morrissey wrote:
I'm looking to process RADIUS accounting locally (SQL) as well as proxy it
to a remote host (to some third party software that also wants to receive a
copy of all accounting).
Is this possible with FreeRADIUS?
Yes. Works
vol...@ufamts.ru wrote:
Alan DeKok wrote:
Yes. Just configure sql in the accounting section, *and* configure
it to proxy.
Alan DeKok.
But if proxy does not respond, FR will insert duplicate records into SQL
table :( Is there some way to avoid it?
What do you mean duplicate records?
31 matches
Mail list logo
