Re: Redundant Radius with Dynamic Data

2005-04-01 Thread Alan DeKok
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any > ideas where I can get rlm_sqlippool from? The archive of this mailling > list contained a few links, non of them worked. :( www.mail-archive.com http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?method=and&format=short&config=freeradius-users_lists_freeradius_org&

RE: Redundant Radius with Dynamic Data

2005-04-01 Thread Chris.Howarth
ECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 March 2005 10:28 To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Subject: RE: Redundant Radius with Dynamic Data Cisco DSL Router .. | . |

RE: Redundant Radius with Dynamic Data

2005-03-31 Thread Chris.Howarth
> here is another suggestion: > > dont use ippools on radius, use it on the nacs. Then you let the radius decide wich ippool to use on the nac by name. > The bad thing is you have to care about pools on nacs, the good one is you haven't to care about pool snyc. That is an excellent suggestion, unf

Re: Redundant Radius with Dynamic Data

2005-03-30 Thread Alan DeKok
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I will most likely use rsync to syncronise the config from the primary > to the secondary. My problem (and hence the reason for this post) is > that the primary would be holding accounting information regarding which > IP addresses have been allocated to each user from

Re: Redundant Radius with Dynamic Data

2005-03-30 Thread Lewis Bergman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Is an SQL backend the best method? Would a shared SQL backend maintain > the integrity of the allocated IP pool? I have experience with Freeradius > and would like to continue with this platform, but is it the best one for > what I am attempting? > An SQL backend is on