On 08/20/2013 02:27 PM, stefan.pae...@diamond.ac.uk wrote:
Hello all,
I'm currently attempting to use rlm_python to query LDAP (with
python-ldap) and then return an XML string in a VSA
(SAML-AAA-Assertion). However, when I try to load it, I get the
dreaded undefined symbol: PyExc_SystemError
12 with, I know, I know, FreeRADIUS 2.1.10. Python-LDAP was
Well... as Alan says, upgrade. Particularly if you know.
There is no 'out of the box' version for upgrade on Ubuntu 12 at this point
short of having to compile it ourselves, that is (situation is similar to
CentOS 6 where the last
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:19:35AM +, stefan.pae...@diamond.ac.uk wrote:
Well... as Alan says, upgrade. Particularly if you know.
There is no 'out of the box' version for upgrade on Ubuntu 12 at
this point short of having to compile it ourselves, that is
Building your own packages on
Building your own packages on Debian/Ubuntu is trivial. There's really
no excuse not to run the latest code.
Matthew, I agree with you, but not when the policy is to only use what is
published on vendor (i.e. Ubuntu) repositories.
But, like I say, that's not a discussion appropriate for the
Hello all,
I'm currently attempting to use rlm_python to query LDAP (with python-ldap) and
then return an XML string in a VSA (SAML-AAA-Assertion). However, when I try to
load it, I get the dreaded undefined symbol: PyExc_SystemError error. This is
on Ubuntu 12 with, I know, I know, FreeRADIUS
stefan.pae...@diamond.ac.uk wrote:
Hello all,
I'm currently attempting to use rlm_python to query LDAP (with python-ldap)
and then return an XML string in a VSA (SAML-AAA-Assertion). However, when I
try to load it, I get the dreaded undefined symbol: PyExc_SystemError
error
Hi,
in perl, i could write some new attributes in RAD_CHECK ??, then
authenticate() will access them.
in python, attributes are read only, so i cannot use them to pass information
to authenticate().
A simple database, like redis, could be a solution by adding info with the id
of the
On 12/12/12 22:04, laurent.fe...@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
If someone can advise me...
How to share information between the authorize() function and the
authenticate() function within a perl or python script ?
Just set an attribute:
authorize {
update request {
Tmp-String-0 :=
and authenticate sections
(rlm_perl rlm_python)
On 12/12/12 22:04, laurent.fe...@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
If someone can advise me...
How to share information between the authorize() function and the
authenticate() function within a perl or python script ?
Just set an attribute:
authorize
Hello,
If someone can advise me...
How to share information between the authorize() function and the
authenticate() function within a perl or python script ?
For example, i get some information from a database in authorize() that will
reuse it in authenticate()?
I could resubmit the sql request
Yes i confirm you cannot change the request's attributes with rlm_python. With
rlm_perl you can (by using the environment variable RAD_REQUEST). I wanted to
modify the username.
So the only solution would be to modify and update the rlm_python code source.
But it is too hard for me...
regards
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
The tuple is a read only object. So, i cannot modify the request attributes
with rlm_python.
Unfortunately, this module is more limited than the perl one. i have to
continue with this one...
Regards,
Laurent
- Mail original -
De: Alan DeKok al
laurent.fe...@free.fr wrote:
The tuple is a read only object. So, i cannot modify the request attributes
with rlm_python.
You already said that. I gave you a solution: fix the code.
Alan Dekok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hello,
I have a perl module that changes the username during the authorization phase
(retrieve from a oracle database) by modifying the user-name attribute in the
RAD_REQUEST dictionary. This update is global and can be used by the
authentication phase (still handled by the perl script).
I
laurent.fe...@free.fr wrote:
in the 'authorize(p)' function, p is the read only tuple of the request. I
cannot update the request here.
Hmm... you should be able to update it. If you can't, the code should
be changed.
Moreover, if i change the tuple config in the authorize function , how
Hello:
Is it at all possible to access this information within these modules? I am
trying to code different behavior in my code based on IP.
Regards,
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 25 Jul 2012, at 14:57, Carl Pierre wrote:
Hello:
Is it at all possible to access this information within these modules? I am
trying to code different behavior in my code based on IP.
NAS-IP-Address yes, Client-IP-Address maybe not, i'd have to check the code…
Are you definitely trying
On 05/30/2012 06:43 AM, PENZ Robert wrote:
replyTuble are the attributes which are send to the requesting NAS,
but I couldn't find out what configTuple is exactly. I currently only
pass an () and it works. Is it the same as update control and
setting variables in the normal config files?
Yes
Hi!
The python functions should return (return, replyTuple, configTuple).
return is one of the following constants
#RLM_MODULE_REJECT = 0 # /* immediately reject the request */
#RLM_MODULE_FAIL = 1 # /* module failed, don't reply */
#RLM_MODULE_OK = 2 # /* the module is OK,
Hi,
I'm trying to use rlm_python to intergrate with my own authentication
backend, but there's so little document about rlm_python. I even cannot
find how to specify the path to the python module.
radiusd.py living in PYTHONPATH - EXPORT PYTHONPATH=$location
alan
-
List info
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to use rlm_python to intergrate with my own authentication
backend, but there's so little document about rlm_python. I even cannot find
how to specify the path to the python module.
Can anybody give me a hint?
Module: Instantiating module python from file
/etc/freeradius
Just to close out this thread with a solution...
Turns out that neither rlm_python nor freeradius were the problem.
They are working perfectly. The problem was my idiot wireless
administrator! Once I beat the password out of him and properly
configured the wireless switch, everything started
Not sure if there isn't another forum or mailing list for rlm_python
specifically, but...
I have been using freeradius for a while now with great results, thanks!
We are using a very simple configuration to authenticate users against LDAP
(eDirectory) and that part works great! I am trying
Bob Brandt wrote:
All my testing seems to indicate it should work, but it is not. I
believe the problem is in how rlm_python returns the
Tunnel-Private-Group-Id attribute.
As a string. The server core parses it into whatever is necessary.
Date, IP address, etc.
Below are the two snipets
which uses the users file and the second is from the
new system using the rlm_python module:
...
Tunnel-Private-Group-Id:0 := 150
...
Tunnel-Private-Group-Id:0 = 150
...
The debug output looks for the most part identical!
Yup.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http
CISSP, CCSP, CCVP, MCNE
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 1:24 AM, in message
AANLkTi=wzuimz+65y3-qzvzdpcvdwp8f4fhht-b+-...@mail.gmail.com, Bob Brandt
b...@brandt.ie wrote:
Not sure if there isn't another forum or mailing list for rlm_python
specifically, but...
I have been using freeradius
.
Brett Littrell
Network Manager
MUSD
CISSP, CCSP, CCVP, MCNE
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 1:24 AM, in message
AANLkTi=wzuimz+65y3-qzvzdpcvdwp8f4fhht-b+-...@mail.gmail.com, Bob Brandt
b...@brandt.ie wrote:
Not sure if there isn't another forum or mailing list for rlm_python
specifically
Josip Rodin wrote:
I had just written the clean rebuild instructions here, but then
I realized what might be wrong - configure.in says:
AC_CHECK_FUNC(lt_dladvise_init, AC_DEFINE(HAVE_HAVE_LT_DLADVISE_INIT, [], [Do
we have the lt_dladvise_init function]))
Changelog:
Update configure script for rlm_python to avoid dynamic linking problems on
some platforms.
I did not have time to test this ever since, but I just did, and unfortunately,
I still have the same problem on Debian Lenny, using the latest FreeRADIUS
backport for Lenny (it is based
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:26:44AM +0100, Aurélien Geron wrote:
Hi and happy new year to everyone,
In april I wrote the message below about python modules not being able to
load dynamic libraries on Debian Lenny.
I did not have time to test this ever since, but I just did, and
Hi Josip,
Here are a few commands that I just launched on my server:
#uname -a
Linux maggie 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 25 04:30:55 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
#dpkg -l | grep libltdl
ii libltdl31.5.26-4+lenny1A system
independent dlopen wrapper for GNU
Hi,
The workaround described in http://bugs.debian.org/416266 for perl works for
python too, I just tried it:
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1 freeradius -X
= works fine
Thanks a lot,
Aurélien Geron
Le 6 janv. 2011 à 14:44, Josip Rodin a écrit :
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:26:44AM
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:46:07PM +0100, Aurélien Geron wrote:
libltdl.so.7 = /usr/lib/libltdl.so.7 (0x7f1018258000)
= FreeRADIUS seems to rely on libltdl.so.7, as expected.
#grep -i advise freeradius.ltrace
= [no output] Apparently, the string advise is nowhere in ltrace's
Aurélien Geron wrote:
Basically, if I understand correctly, his idea is to have the python fellows
declare the proper dependencies in every *.so file, so that the
libpython2.5.so.1 file gets loaded automatically when the math module (or
any other dynamic module) gets loaded. Maybe that's
Alan DeKok wrote:
Aurélien Geron wrote:
Basically, if I understand correctly, his idea is to have the python fellows
declare the proper dependencies in every *.so file, so that the
libpython2.5.so.1 file gets loaded automatically when the math module (or
any other dynamic module) gets
Hi,
I came across a bug when rlm_python executes python code that tries to load a
dynamic (shared) module. This bug seems to have been discussed 2 or 3 times on
this list, but no really satisfying solution appears to have been found so far
(as far as I know), so I thought I might raise
Good day Freeradius users,
I am trying to use the rlm_python module to do additional actions after an
user has been authenticated. To learn, I'm using the radiusd_test.py which
is in the python path. I haven't found an indication that says it is
impossible to do, correct me if I'm wrong off
phil lemelin wrote:
/usr/local/etc/raddb/sites-enabled/default[422]: python modules
aren't allowed in 'post-auth' sections -- they have no such method.
/usr/local/etc/raddb/sites-enabled/default[380]: Errors parsing
post-auth section.
Is this caused because I can't use
Hi,
It's because you're using an old version of the server. i.e. 1.x, not
2.x.
sites-enabled/default etc in 1.1.x? I cant recall seeing that config :-)
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi,
Created a python module under modules :
so long as you are using FR 2.1.x then you shouldnt
need to do that - just simply edit experimental.conf
to make sure the python stuff is active and then edit
radiusd.conf to make sure that experimental.conf is included
(you did compile FR with
the :
rlm_example* files
rlm_python* files
Seeing that echo_NAS_Info loads, i suspect there is something else that has
to be done in order to activate de experimental modules/config.
When you say, simply edit experimental.conf, should I change something in
it, or by default it should be ok
Alan Buxey wrote:
Hi,
It's because you're using an old version of the server. i.e. 1.x, not
2.x.
sites-enabled/default etc in 1.1.x? I cant recall seeing that config :-)
The post-auth section has been in rlm_python for a long time. Whether
it's 1.x, or 2.0.x, or a 8 month-old
Hi,
I'm running FR 2.1.4.
hmm, i've had a quick skim through the code and it looks
like pre 2.1.7 didnt have some of the hooks etc needed to
be run in that section - why play with older version - give
2.1.7 a go...if you're compiling from source you may as well
run the latest /best version
Alan,
Thank you for you time.
I downloaded, compiled and installed the 2.1.7 version.
I replaced my /usr/local/raddb folder by the 2.1.7 raddb folder and used
that to make sure my config didnt conflict.
I only modified radiusd.conf to add experimental.conf and added python in
the post-auth
I went back to creating a python module in the modules folder and the
post-auth is now working.
There is something missing in the experimental.conf to have it work with
that method. I prefer creating a python module anyway. Looks like there is a
bug in 2.1.4 and rlm_python where the post-auth
Hi,
The key for me here was to update to 2.1.7
2.1.7 and to call the python in the modules/* section
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
2009 : Debug: modules {
Wed Jul 8 12:10:51 2009 : Debug: Module: Checking authenticate {...}
for more modules to load
Wed Jul 8 12:10:51 2009 : Debug: (Loaded rlm_python, checking if
it's valid)
Wed Jul 8 12:10:51 2009 : Debug: Module: Linked to module rlm_python
Wed Jul 8 12:10:51
I am sure i'm not the only person experiencing this problem. It seems
when using the python module to handle auth/acct.
If you include the MySQLdb module in the python script freeradius then
dies and is unable to load the pythong module.
I am using the latest stable freeradius version 2.1.6,
Yeah sure does,
If I remove the line import MySQLdb it works fine.
It seems to definanetly have a issue with this module. I've also tried
sqlobject as a module and I get the same problem.
Thanks,
Mike
Ivan Kalik wrote:
I am sure i'm not the only person experiencing this problem. It seems
On 07/08/2009 04:16 AM, Michael da Silva Pereira wrote:
Hi All,
I am sure i'm not the only person experiencing this problem. It seems
when using the python module to handle auth/acct.
If you include the MySQLdb module in the python script freeradius then
dies and is unable to load the pythong
Hello Freeradius-users,
I'm trying to use Freeradius 2.1.6 release with rlm_python (python 2.6.2) on
FreeBSD.
I use default radiusd_test.py bundled with rlm_python. All is fine
when I start radius in debug mode with -X, however in normal forked
mode next error appear:
Error: WARNING
I'm trying to use Freeradius 2.1.6 release with rlm_python (python 2.6.2)
on
FreeBSD.
I use default radiusd_test.py bundled with rlm_python. All is fine
when I start radius in debug mode with -X, however in normal forked
mode next error appear:
Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child
Hello Ivan,
Monday, June 22, 2009 12:20:38 PM, you wrote:
IK Permissions. Check if freeradius user has permissions to execute the
IK script. I assume that you have checked that script actually works.
Thanks for the answer.
I was testing under root user, so the permissions should not be a
IK Permissions. Check if freeradius user has permissions to execute the
IK script. I assume that you have checked that script actually works.
Thanks for the answer.
I was testing under root user, so the permissions should not be a
problem, but I checked that also - added
user = root
Hello Ivan,
As I told - all working file in freeradius debug mode (with -X), I
have problems with productional threads pool mode.
Sure there is no 'authenticate' function but 'authorize', that
function called while authentificate block executed:
python {
mod_instantiate =
As I told - all working file in freeradius debug mode (with -X), I
have problems with productional threads pool mode.
When things work with radiusd -X and don't under radius user problems are
permissions, SE Linux or stuff like that.
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
-
List
As I told - all working file in freeradius debug mode (with -X), I
have problems with productional threads pool mode.
I see the same issue with rlm_perl and my perl code. Works fine in
radiusd -X, or if perl is compiled to not use threads, but as soon as I
compile perl for threading and start
Hi Hristo
Could you supply a quick example ?
Its always good to get working example after a problem is resolved (even
if the person is resolved by the questioner)
Mike
Hristo Trendev wrote:
The examples in src/modules/rlm_python gave me some hints and I
figured it out. Thanks anyway
I am trying to figure out how to properly setup freeradius with
rlm_python. The module loads and scripts execute, but I seem to miss
something when I try to return value pairs to be used in the reply
packet (Access-Accept). I have tried with the following script:
def authorize (params
The examples in src/modules/rlm_python gave me some hints and I
figured it out. Thanks anyway.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Hristo Trendev dist.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to figure out how to properly setup freeradius with
rlm_python. The module loads and scripts execute, but I seem
Alexander Yu. Solodukhin a...@softwarium.net писал(а) в своём письме Sat,
28 Feb 2009 22:40:35 +0200:
Hi all.
I try to use rlm_python and got import error on importing any module
that relevant on shared object.
Here an rlm_python configuration:
## cut
python {
mod_instantiate
Hi all.
I try to use rlm_python and got import error on importing any module that
relevant on shared object.
Here an rlm_python configuration:
## cut
python {
mod_instantiate = account
func_instantiate = instantiate
mod_authorize = account
func_authorize
:
--with-experimental-modules \
--with-rlm_python
created config files and my pythom module radiusd_isp,
put it python path
freeradius -X out me:
python {
mod_instantiate = radiusd_isp
func_instantiate = instantiate
Hello all!
I want to use python possibilities to authorize users with
freeradius.
So, I compiled freeradius with options:
--with-experimental-modules \
--with-rlm_python
created config files and my pythom module radiusd_isp,
put it python path
freeradius -X out
/freeradius-python/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] site-packages]#
Cheers
Mike
Alexander Demidoff wrote:
Hello all!
I want to use python possibilities to authorize users with
freeradius.
So, I compiled freeradius with options:
--with-experimental-modules \
--with-rlm_python
python possibilities to authorize users with
freeradius.
So, I compiled freeradius with options:
--with-experimental-modules \
--with-rlm_python
created config files and my pythom module radiusd_isp,
put it python path
freeradius -X out me
At the end of my attempts to resolve the problem I've found out
1. Compiling options
--with-experimental-modules \
--with-rlm_python \
--with-static-modules=python
2. Befor starting of freeradius I created radiusd_isp.pyc file in the
interactive
Alan DeKok wrote:
Mike O'Connor wrote:
I wrote the attached patch for Freeradius 1.1.7 to enabled calling
python in the post-proxy, it compiles but will not run when the hook is
listed in post-proxy because Freeradius complains that there is no
support for post-proxy in rlm_python
Mike O'Connor wrote:
Maybe I'm not getting your but even the lastest cvs does not have any
post-proxy or post-auth support.
That's not what I meant.
My code added the post-proxy but when I tried to use it freeradius would
complain that rlm_python did not support being called from the post
Hi Alan
I think I have worked it out, some how I got my self confused during my
testing.
The model was there but I think each time I did not have everything
configured.
Thanks as always for your time
Mike
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi Guys
I wrote the attached patch for Freeradius 1.1.7 to enabled calling
python in the post-proxy, it compiles but will not run when the hook is
listed in post-proxy because Freeradius complains that there is no
support for post-proxy in rlm_python.
My question is where in the source
Mike O'Connor wrote:
I wrote the attached patch for Freeradius 1.1.7 to enabled calling
python in the post-proxy, it compiles but will not run when the hook is
listed in post-proxy because Freeradius complains that there is no
support for post-proxy in rlm_python.
You didn't install the new
Mike O'Connor wrote:
I decided to try freeradius-2.0.0-pre2 and its give a much clear idea of
the problem.
The issue seems to be that the rlm_python module is having trouble
loading dynamic code.
I suspect it's a shared library problem. The time.so library depends
on another one
to be that the rlm_python module is having trouble
loading dynamic code.
I suspect it's a shared library problem. The time.so library depends
on another one that contains PyExc_IOError. However, that dependency is
NOT recorded in time.so. That dependency is also NOT built
idea of
the problem.
The issue seems to be that the rlm_python module is having trouble
loading dynamic code.
I suspect it's a shared library problem. The time.so library depends
on another one that contains PyExc_IOError. However, that dependency is
NOT recorded in time.so
to be that the rlm_python module is having trouble
loading dynamic code.
I suspect it's a shared library problem. The time.so library depends
on another one that contains PyExc_IOError. However, that dependency is
NOT recorded in time.so. That dependency is also NOT built into
FreeRADIUS
Hi All Again
I have not fixed it, with all the playing around with FreeRadius
versions I had not got rlm_python loading when I believed I had fixed it.
Mike :(
Mike O'Connor wrote:
Hi All
I'm happy to say I have fixed this issue.
I'm not totally happy with the way I did it because it would
Hi Guys
Got a problem with rlm_python using 1.1.7 on Debian etch with no changes
to source other than to move rlm_python in to the stable modules file.
The module is in the path and an strace shows the file being found.
rlm_python:python_load_function: module 'radiusd_test' is not found
Mike O'Connor wrote:
Got a problem with rlm_python using 1.1.7 on Debian etch with no changes
to source other than to move rlm_python in to the stable modules file.
The module is in the path and an strace shows the file being found.
Is radiusd.py in the path?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info
Hi Alan
Is radiusd.py in the path?
Yep in the same place as my own code
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/
Strace never shows that file being requested for loading.
Mike
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi Guys
I decided to try freeradius-2.0.0-pre2 and its give a much clear idea of
the problem.
The issue seems to be that the rlm_python module is having trouble
loading dynamic code.
Mike
write(1, exceptions.ImportError: /usr/lib...,
97exceptions.ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.4/lib-dynload
All,
I am in need of developing my own application using rlm_python. Can
anybody inform me about some documentation available? From what I have
found on Internet it looks like an isolate project with lack of users
...
Anybody able to share the experience with me? Is it stable for
production
Hi All,
I am in need of developing my own application using rlm_python. Can anybody
inform me about some documentation available? From what I have found on
Internet it looks like an isolate project with lack of users ... Anybody able
to share the experience with me? Is it stable for production
On Mon 28 May 2007, UriCALL Support wrote:
Hi All,
I am in need of developing my own application using rlm_python. Can
anybody inform me about some documentation available? From what I have
found on Internet it looks like an isolate project with lack of users ...
Anybody able to share
Mike O'Connor wrote:
I wish to add some extra valid pairs to accounting packets which are
being proxied to other radius servers.
If in the 'preacct' or the 'accounting' stage I was to add using
rlm_python or rlm_perl value pairs would they be sent thought to the
other radius servers
Hi All
I wish to add some extra valid pairs to accounting packets which are
being proxied to other radius servers.
If in the 'preacct' or the 'accounting' stage I was to add using
rlm_python or rlm_perl value pairs would they be sent thought to the
other radius servers ?
Thanks
Mike
-
List
Hi Guys
Is anyone actually using rlm_python in production?
We do. But with a home-made module, based on corrected
module stored in bugzilla.
We made adjustments in it to meet our customer needs,
and it is therefore not reusable.
Nevertheless, we did correct memory leaks, threading
issues
Peter Nixon wrote:
Hi Guys
Is anyone actually using rlm_python in production? Unlike rlm_perl we don't
seem to have any example code or any decent documentation. I am looking at
using it myself and just looking for some feedback..
Apply the patches from bugs.freeradius.org. They've
On Sat 27 Jan 2007 09:38, Alan DeKok wrote:
Peter Nixon wrote:
Hi Guys
Is anyone actually using rlm_python in production? Unlike rlm_perl we
don't seem to have any example code or any decent documentation. I am
looking at using it myself and just looking for some feedback..
Apply
Peter Nixon wrote:
Hmm.. the only open bug I see against rlm_python is:
http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182
Are there some others that I didn't manage to find?
I recall someone re-writing much of the module to make it work. But I
didn't have time to look over the patches
Hi Guys
Is anyone actually using rlm_python in production? Unlike rlm_perl we don't
seem to have any example code or any decent documentation. I am looking at
using it myself and just looking for some feedback..
Cheers
--
Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/
PGP Key: http
Hi,
I have noticed that more recent rlm_python versions have function
bindings for implementing Simultaneous-Use checking in python module.
Something like this
...
python_init done
Module: Loaded python
python: mod_instantiate = pppoe
python: func_instantiate = instantiate
python
why radius say :
authorize: function call failedexceptions.TypeError: unsubscriptable object
belowis a modify radius_test.py
=
# Miguel A.L. Paraz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
import radiusdimport MySQLdb
def instantiate(p): print *** instantiate *** print p
def
Ilia Chipitsine wrote:
When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing
for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ?
The module rlm_python is still experimental. There are known issues
with this module.
http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227
Ilia Chipitsine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if existing rlm_python is buggy why not to use better version ?
Because the primary FreeRADIUS developers don't use python.
Please use the updated module yourself, and if it works for you,
email the list and say so.
If no one says that the new
Dear Sirs,
I just made diff between 1.0.4 and 1.1.0 rlm_python sources and they
appear to be the same.
When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing
for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ?
We develop an application that uses rlm_python and we
Ilia Chipitsine wrote:
When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing
for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ?
The module rlm_python is still experimental. There are known issues
with this module.
http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227
... what is better to use rlm_perl or rlm_python?
I would have to learn python, but if the general concensus is to go with python
I'll do it.
TIA
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
?
No, but latest version is best :)
A very subjective question here... what is better to use rlm_perl or
rlm_python?
I think that rlm_perl is likely to be supported better than rlm_python.
I would have to learn python, but if the general concensus is to go
with python I'll do it.
Go for rlm_perl
:19
Aan: FreeRadius users mailing list
Onderwerp: Re: rlm_perl / rlm_python
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
Could someone tell me what versions of freeradius have rlm_perl?
All latest version have it. But it's unstable and therefore you have to
compile from source using --with-experimental
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
