Re: [Freesurfer] FsFast Functional Connectivity with subject-specific surface seeds

2011-12-22 Thread konglq
Thanks Doug. The labels work perfectly now. I also have a methodological question about the fsfast connectivity analysis: functional connectivity analyses in the literature (Biswal, etc) only looks at low-frequency fluctuations from BOLD signals. After preprocessing and regressing out nuisance

Re: [Freesurfer] FsFast Functional Connectivity with subject-specific surface seeds

2011-12-22 Thread Douglas N Greve
Hi Lingqiang, I did not have a strong reason not to do the low pass filtering. I think I tried it once and it did not seem to make much difference, so I did not implement it in FSFAST. The differences may be due to filtering, but there are a lot of other places where things can be different

[Freesurfer] FsFast Functional Connectivity with subject-specific surface seeds

2011-12-21 Thread konglq
Hi Freesurfers, We are trying to do a resting-state functional connectivity analysis using freesurfer. Instead of using the aparc+aseg segmentations as seeds, we would like to use a subject-specific surface labels that we have defined apriori. In the fcseed-config step, we then don't have a

Re: [Freesurfer] FsFast Functional Connectivity with subject-specific surface seeds

2011-12-21 Thread Douglas N Greve
Hi Lingqiang, convert your .label file to a volume using mri_label2vol for each subject, something like cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/$subject/mri mri_label2vol --label lh.yourlabel.label --temp orig.mgz --regheader orig.mgz --subject $subject --hemi lh --proj frac 0 1 .1 --o yourlabel.mgz When you run