On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 06:19 +1100, Liz wrote:
> what i really mean is that you expect such a small set of users over 50 years
> that there is no further subdivision?
I see what you mean.
I have no opinion as to whether or not it's useful to subdivide the 50+
category. However, it doesn't really
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> > so you don't expect users over 50 years?
>
> Users older than 50 would select the "> 50" option.
what i really mean is that you expect such a small set of users over 50 years
that there is no further subdivision?
I am over 50, and I'm not over 70,
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 11:26 -0600, Evan Hisey wrote:
> the 100hz/120hz screens do not tear as badly with high speed detail. I
> watch a lot martial art flicks and the slight tearing at the edges of
> everything on LCD/plasmas can really get annoying fast.
I think, like anything else, you can buy c
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 11:08 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>> It is Full HD. No 100Hz, I don't see the point if I do not have any 100
>> fps content. It lacks 24p support, but maybe you can live with that.
>
> I'm not well read on LCDs (I'm more
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 10:44 -0500, Brett Granger wrote:
> I would recommend adding some item(s) to the effect of playing back
> streaming media (internet videos/TV, radio, etc). That seems to be
> gaining in popularity recently.
Thanks, good suggestion. I added:
[ ] Streaming Internet radio
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> Hi Evan,
>
> On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 22:55 -0600, Evan Hisey wrote:
>> most people. But suddenly needing to upgrade the whole system will put
>> people off about the move to 2.x
>
> It's inevitable we are going to leave behind some people wi
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> As I mentioned in the other thread, I'd like to work up a web-based
> survey to help us get a better idea about our userbase.
>
> Here are some ideas for questions. They are not numbered because the
> numbering is up for debate too. Please provide suggestions for other
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 10:54 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and 945GT Express Memory
> Controller Hub
>
> IIRC it is a 950
Google agrees. Thanks.
--
This SF.net email is sp
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 09:30 +, Adam Charrett wrote:
> Can I also suggest 'Via Unichrome series' here as a large number of Via
> based mini-itx boards have this integrated in the chipset.
Sure, thanks.
--
This SF.net
Hi Liz,
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 20:20 +1100, Liz wrote:
> > #. Age:
> > (o) Decline to answer
> > ( ) < 18
> > ( ) 18-25
> > ( ) 26-35
> > ( ) 36-50
> > ( ) > 50
> >
> so you don't expect users over 50 years?
Users older than 50 would select the "> 50
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 10:11 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> I would like to know if it is 4:3 or 16:9. Maybe also 16:10 for LCD
> monitors. It could be an extra question, but it would be nice to know
> for the theme code.
I agree that's a useful thing to know.
Even though it overlaps with the resoluti
Hi Evan,
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 22:55 -0600, Evan Hisey wrote:
> most people. But suddenly needing to upgrade the whole system will put
> people off about the move to 2.x
It's inevitable we are going to leave behind some people with the 2.x
architecture. We've accepted that already. The survey s
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 11:08 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> It is Full HD. No 100Hz, I don't see the point if I do not have any 100
> fps content. It lacks 24p support, but maybe you can live with that.
I'm not well read on LCDs (I'm more of a plasma guy) but it seems to me
the 100Hz (or 120Hz for NTSC
Hans Meine wrote:
> BTW: In reply to James Trietsch you wrote:
>> 22'' 16:10 LCD: around 200 EUR
>> A _good_ 37'' TFT TV: around 600 EUR
>
> That's not how I recall the situation in local stores; although there are
> certainly some TVs for 600€ which are not too bad, *good* TVs (i.e. Full HD,
> m
Evan Hisey wrote:
> I have not done any testing on 2 yet
And you acn't, because the code in question is not in svn yet
> but my currently very reliable Freevo system runs standard def. TV
> just fine on 2gz single core box with little overhead. I really hope
> that Freevo 2 is not going to sudden
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 13:23 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>> I have problems getting vsync on my external monitor, but the clutter
>> test app worked well with 1080p video.
>
> And, I forget, did you have GMA 900 or 950?
Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and 94
On Tue, January 27, 2009 5:57 pm, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
>
> #. Video card or graphics chipset of your system running Freevo:
>
> This can often be determined by running lspci | grep -i
> vga at the shell.
>
> (Chipset names will be linked to wiki article for more info)
>
>
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> As I mentioned in the other thread, I'd like to work up a web-based
> survey to help us get a better idea about our userbase.
>
> Here are some ideas for questions. They are not numbered because the
> numbering is up for debate too. Please provide su
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> (o) CRT television (interlaced)
> ( ) CRT monitor (progressive)
I would like to know if it is 4:3 or 16:9. Maybe also 16:10 for LCD
monitors. It could be an extra question, but it would be nice to know
for the theme code.
Dischi
--
C++: The power, elegance and simplic
On Dienstag 27 Januar 2009, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 21:55 +0100, Hans Meine wrote:
> > I find this one difficult. I just bought a 1920x1200 LCD for my
> > dedicated Freevo box, is that "geared toward PCs"? It's probably a
> > corner case, and given the caption "best descri
On Dienstag 27 Januar 2009, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Hans Meine wrote:
> > I find this one difficult. I just bought a 1920x1200 LCD for my
> > dedicated Freevo box, is that "geared toward PCs"? It's probably a
> > corner case, and given the caption "best describes", I'd still choose
> > that option, b
21 matches
Mail list logo
