Re: [Freevo-devel] Recordserver thoughts; both 1.x and 2.0

2007-08-23 Thread John Molohan
Justin Wetherell wrote: > I think "duplicate detection" and "only new" are only as good as the > "program data". When I get a chance, I can post a pseudo code version > of the rescheduling algorithm. I am not sure what the +1 channel thing > is, so I don't know if it has been addressed. It's jus

Re: [Freevo-devel] Recordserver thoughts; both 1.x and 2.0

2007-08-23 Thread Justin Wetherell
I think "duplicate detection" and "only new" are only as good as the "program data". When I get a chance, I can post a pseudo code version of the rescheduling algorithm. I am not sure what the +1 channel thing is, so I don't know if it has been addressed. On 8/23/07, Andrew Flegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Freevo-devel] Recordserver thoughts; both 1.x and 2.0

2007-08-23 Thread Andrew Flegg
On 8/23/07, Justin Wetherell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe a lot of these issues are already addressed in 1.x version of > Freevo. I implemented a Priority System, Duplicate Detection, > Rescheduling if conflicted, specifying *any* channel, and *only new* > episode recording quite awhile

Re: [Freevo-devel] Recordserver thoughts; both 1.x and 2.0

2007-08-23 Thread Justin Wetherell
I believe a lot of these issues are already addressed in 1.x version of Freevo. I implemented a Priority System, Duplicate Detection, Rescheduling if conflicted, specifying *any* channel, and *only new* episode recording quite awhile ago. Maybe I missed some the point? On 8/23/07, Andrew Flegg <[

[Freevo-devel] Recordserver thoughts; both 1.x and 2.0

2007-08-23 Thread Andrew Flegg
Hi, With the launch of another +1 channel on DVB-T in the UK - and my playing around with CRIDs in the DVB EIT (i.e. series link/unique programmes & repeats etc.) - I've come up with a list of requirements *I* would like to see in the record server, and wondered how many of these have been conside