On Thu 31.07.2003 at 07:17:06AM -0400, Aubin Paul wrote:
I'm going to enable it in CVS right now; I don't imagine there will be
any problems. If files change, they are recompiled as before.
I'm not even clear on what the downside is.
There seem to be no problem: I added a ``-O'' in the
Ok, I tried that... let's see what happens/breaks/goes faster :)
I assume the downside is longer startup the first time it's run A I'm
pretty sure it's negligible after that.
Aubin
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:38:35PM +0300, Matthieu Weber wrote:
On Thu 31.07.2003 at 07:17:06AM -0400, Aubin Paul
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Aubin Paul wrote:
I'm going to enable it in CVS right now; I don't imagine there will be
any problems. If files change, they are recompiled as before.
I'm not even clear on what the downside is.
If I remember right, the code is not compiled into a
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:26:40PM +0200, Thomas Schueppel wrote:
If I remember right, the code is not compiled into a
platform independant bytecode but in platform depandant
code. Hence the only thing we need to make sure is that
there are no pyos in our distro but
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Aubin Paul wrote:
/usr/bin/python2.3 -OO /usr/lib/python2.3/compileall.py /path/to/freevo
This will byte-compile everything and will avoid the first run/access
slowdowns.
Debian does this with packages, it could be done with RPMs too.
That's what I do in the
I tried running Freevo last night with 'python -O src/main.py' and it
seemed noticeably faster... Is there any reason we don't use it by
default?
Aubin
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports,
I tried running Freevo last night with 'python -O src/main.py' and it
seemed noticeably faster... Is there any reason we don't use it by
default?
Not that I can remember. It might be worth looking into using Python 2.3,
besides all the new goodies it is supposedly faster too.
/
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Aubin Paul wrote:
I tried running Freevo last night with 'python -O src/main.py' and it
seemed noticeably faster... Is there any reason we don't use it by
default?
I've no objections as long as it's still shipped as part of the runtime.
I don't know what trickery RedHat
It's not a Python 2.3-only feature; all the 2.x versions support -O as
far as I know. -O just compiles to .pyo instead of .pyc and is faster.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:49:29AM +0800, Wan Tat Chee wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Aubin Paul wrote:
I tried running Freevo last night with 'python -O
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Aubin Paul wrote:
It's not a Python 2.3-only feature; all the 2.x versions support -O as
far as I know. -O just compiles to .pyo instead of .pyc and is faster.
I see. So do we plan to activate this for the next release? What happens
to *.py that were changed since the
10 matches
Mail list logo