ground views of over 100 .1-.5 km shallow (ice comet fragment bursts)
craters, Bajada del Diablo, Argentina (.78-.13 Ma BP) [42.87 S 67.47 W]
Rogelio D Acevedo et al, Geomorphology 2009 Sept: Rich Murray 2010.03.28
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2010_03_01_archive.htm
Saturday, March 27, 2010
h
Courtesy of Seth Godin, video of Taylor Mali, poet
worth watching.
Seth's Blog: What teachers make
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http:
rich:
you were right ! If you select just the highlighted text , it works,
if you double
click , like most hyperlink, then it select all the text, and goes no where!
regards
michael barron
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Rich Murray wrote:
> El Solitario 29.4982 -103.7625, 1.254 km low insid
YIKES! Eric, please don't encourage anybody to read sarcasm into my message.
Absolutely none was intended.
The question I am toying with, is, does the model work without a "genefur"
peletonizing? If you see me leaning toward some conclusion, it would only be
that if such a gene is lurking
Hugh,
Very interesting model! One of my doctoral adviser's, Jeffrey Schank has
demonstrated repeatedly that scientists are very bad at predicting what
'chance' looks like when trying to do experiments involving synchrony. This
seems one of those situations, and the only way around it is modeling.
Hugh,
Even if it has nothing to do with sperm it is a nifty model.
There is an idea lurking here that i dont know whether it plays a covert
role in your thinking or not, but what about the fate of a "genefur"
peletonizing.
My email program is misbehaving and my computer is about to crash so
Thanks for taking a peek at my post. Great questions, and they help me to
see how/where my descriptions can be clarified.
On the paradox part - that is one of the really interesting features of a
peloton: the energy savings effect of drafting narrows the range of fitness
between the strongest
On Mar 26, 2010, at 11:59 PM, sarbajit roy wrote:
Hi
Welcome!
I'm an engineer (so not really a scientist). Was just mulling if
everything on this list has to be "complex" (ie. made complicated) by
converting / reducing to simple mathematical "models" (with loads of
assumptions) to solve probl
