Re: [FRIAM] Assistance sought: The meaning of constraints

2011-03-16 Thread lrudolph
[my comment follows Russ's] Russ Abbot writes: > As I understand it, work is defined as the change in kinetic energy > resulting from the application of a force. Normally that means work is force > times distance. So if there is no distance (no motion) there is no change in > kinetic energy and

Re: [FRIAM] Apocalypse in Japan

2011-03-16 Thread Alfredo Covaleda
Hi Who is going to produce the good and services that Japan is stoping to manufacture because of the disaster? My probably "raw opinion" is that an unfortunate event like this one, is the oportunity that US needs to reactive his economy. ¿Isn't it? Alfredo C. 2011/3/15 Jochen Fromm > A str

[FRIAM] Work! Fer Gawd and Newton's sake!

2011-03-16 Thread plissaman
Come on, Peoples!  Work is DEFINED in Newtonian mechanics as being done "when a force moves its point of application".  Thass all - and plenty enuff!  So you lift a box up to a shelf - you doing work, as defined by Isaac, the Laborers Union and most Plain Folks.  You put a whiskey jigger on a

Re: [FRIAM] Work! Fer Gawd and Newton's sake!

2011-03-16 Thread Douglas Roberts
In the true spirit of FRIAM, I propose that we generalize what we mean by "generalize". And then we could perhaps steer the discussion in the direction of how to produce a "generalizable" ABM. Said ABM could be made aware of it's computing host, therefore further generalizing its computation capa

[FRIAM] A modest proposal

2011-03-16 Thread plissaman
The two nuclear plants in CA, San Onofre and Diablo Canyon, produce about 4.5 GW together.   Both are coastline installations vulnerable to seismic and tsunami activity.   CA total electrical power plant capacity is about 33 GW .  In 2010 t otal "used capacity " for 100% full operation was abo

[FRIAM] Emergent Fish Hole.

2011-03-16 Thread James Steiner
This is cool, RE emergent properties (the hole)/collective behavior (the fish), and also somewhat funny. Poor big fish. Little fish won't stay put. http://chzgifs.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/fishmagnetsarerepulsedp1.gif Containing site (not recommended): http://failblog.org/2011/03/07/epic-fail-p

Re: [FRIAM] A modest proposal

2011-03-16 Thread Carl Tollander
Oranges and Apples maybe? They're different technologies (BWR vs PWR). It does not appear that any of the current issues at Fukushima originated with the basic design, but were due to loss of supporting infrastructure (e.g., loss of grid power to the pumps, the wave washed out the diesel bac

Re: [FRIAM] A modest proposal

2011-03-16 Thread Tom Johnson
And lotsaluck in getting PG&E -- the power company -- to pay for the decomissioning. -tj On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:11 PM, wrote: > The two nuclear plants in CA, San Onofre and Diablo Canyon, produce about > 4.5 GW together. Both are coastline installations vulnerable to seismic > and tsunami

Re: [FRIAM] Apocalypse in Japan

2011-03-16 Thread Jochen Fromm
If you read the Wall Street Journal, then you get the impression the situation is not that bad at all, it is only unconfortable for Tepco (Tokyo Electric Power Company). If you follow the media and read the newspapers here in Germany, you get a completely different opinion. You get the impression

[FRIAM] Model Everything

2011-03-16 Thread Tom Johnson
A new, Santa Fe-based resource for the modeling/simulation communities. http://modeleverything.com/ --tom johnson FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscri

Re: [FRIAM] Apocalypse in Japan

2011-03-16 Thread Gillian Densmore
in the US the problem isn't just saftey it's NIMBY. (not in my back yard). I'm far far far from being an expert on whats bog standard practice to store spent rods. That being said the very few physics i've talked to have said right off theoreticly you could store spent cells just abount anywhere si

Re: [FRIAM] Apocalypse in Japan

2011-03-16 Thread Gillian Densmore
Well not just that but hopefuly it's a time to apreciat the unreal amount of help asia does for the global economy. That being said offshoring is a horrible way to run the US economy. It makes it way to sustible to not just economic problems but natural acts of God! More work done 'in house' in the

Re: [FRIAM] Work! Fer Gawd and Newton's sake!

2011-03-16 Thread lrudolph
I heard thee speak me a speech once, but it was never acted, or if it was, not above once; for the play, I remember, pleas'd not the million, 'twas caviare to the general. > In general, I agree. > > -R > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Douglas Roberts wrote: > > > In the true spirit of FRIA

Re: [FRIAM] Work! Fer Gawd and Newton's sake!

2011-03-16 Thread ERIC P. CHARLES
Agreed! Work, constraint, cause, etc. were all words long before Newton (if we are willing to translate them, many centuries before). Newton gave them very technical meanings in his system, but the technical meanings were "just" a matter of making more strict the common meanings. We could, if we

Re: [FRIAM] Work! Fer Gawd and Newton's sake!

2011-03-16 Thread Sarbajit Roy
"Railroad lines represent useful constraints to freight cars" A clear application of the 3rd law depending on the frame of reference of the "static" rail system. So would the "frame" itself constitute a constraint ? On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:53 PM, wrote: > Come on, Peoples! Work is DEFINED i

Re: [FRIAM] Apocalypse in Japan

2011-03-16 Thread Carl Tollander
Everything of consequence is on a fault somewhere. On 3/16/11 5:31 PM, Gillian Densmore wrote: Well not just that but hopefuly it's a time to apreciat the unreal amount of help asia does for the global economy. That being said offshoring is a horrible way to run the US economy. It makes it way t

Re: [FRIAM] Work! Fer Gawd and Newton's sake!

2011-03-16 Thread Vladimyr Burachynsky
Eric , Please do not disengage just yet, first. I did not know if the mysterious Writer wished to use engineering terms or to simply capitalize on Cache. It does not matter either way. The fact is the brain cobbled together all these terms long before Newton Leibniz and Descartes. So why why wo