What started the problem (at least in the West)"
*"Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our
likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the
birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the
earth, and over every
Sorry. I admire your memory.
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
On Fri, May 21, 2021, 3:11 PM uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ wrote:
> Only about 100,000 times. >8^D The trick is whether or not you believe
> that sort of modeling is mechanistic or *merely* genera
Only about 100,000 times. >8^D The trick is whether or not you believe that
sort of modeling is mechanistic or *merely* generative.
On 5/21/21 2:08 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
> Did I already post this here?
>
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228446085_Simulation_validation_using_Caus
This is an old article (2016). I wish I'd learned about it sooner. GScholar
shows 37 citations I *should*, but probably won't, go through.
Changing Conspiracy Beliefs through Rationality and Ridiculing
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01525/full
"Conspiracy theory (CT) be
Did I already post this here?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228446085_Simulation_validation_using_Causal_Inference_Theory_with_morphological_constraints#fullTextFileContent
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
On Fri, May 21, 2021, 3
Well, to be clear, it wasn't (I don't think) Russ' rhetoric but Weintrobe via
McKibbon. Russ was simply pointing it out to us.
But further, Weintrobe's argument seems to be (I haven't read the book, only a
couple of reviews of it) a mechanistic explanation for how we in the northern
hemisphere
I agree with you. It's very challenging to make sense of the world, and the
human mind is amazing at building generative models of the world and those
models become the reality for the mind. With the models we can make
conclusions and explain how the world actually works. Now the clincher, to
make
I'm also wondering if there's a similar result for hypergraphs to the
"parallelism theorem", which might state that any hypergraph can be perfectly
"simulated" by an ordinary graph.
On 5/19/21 11:28 AM, uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ wrote:
> I can't help but wonder if the hypergraph is something like a *modal* graph
There's a layering in the relationship between fact and opinion. And what the
postmodernists warned us about is that many of us are unable to unravel those
layers. The idea that there exist absolute facts and (mere) interpretations of
those facts can often be an indicator for the inability to un
The world is the better for all not having the same views on everything.
Surely there's a difference between facts and opinions? Your "*But it is
*NOT* a sound, sensible, or rational view, any more than a stopped clock is
right twice per day.*" is your opinion, it's not a fact.
Interesting work
Interesting. We hear from righties like Brett Weinstein and Ben Shapiro all the
time how postmodernists' "relativism" is diluting our culture and sending us on
the path to Hell. Is this such a relativism?
I'm reminded of the "all sides" fallacy or the snowflake idea that any
arbitrary opinion
11 matches
Mail list logo
