Re: [FRIAM] virtualized public IPs

2018-08-22 Thread Russell Standish
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:44:14AM +0200, Stephen Guerin wrote: > Markus,  > > While not exactly virtualized IP, can you accomplish what you need via a > dynamic DNS solution, ngrok.com or localtunnel.me and then manage routing on > your internal network? dynamic DNS is not really important -

Re: [FRIAM] virtualized public IPs

2018-08-22 Thread Marcus Daniels
ideal. Marcus From: Friam on behalf of Stephen Guerin Reply-To: "stephen.gue...@redfish.com" , The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 at 3:44 AM To: Friam Friam Subject: Re: [FRIAM] virtualized public IPs Markus, While not exactly virtual

Re: [FRIAM] virtualized public IPs

2018-08-22 Thread Gary Schiltz
I struggled for years with a proprietary product called Hamachi ( http://vpn.net - a "zero config" "hole punching" VPN). It worked more or less well to connect computers behind restrictive firewalls, but the Linux version was in perpetual beta for years. Once the company and software were bought

Re: [FRIAM] virtualized public IPs

2018-08-22 Thread Stephen Guerin
Markus, While not exactly virtualized IP, can you accomplish what you need via a dynamic DNS solution, ngrok.com or localtunnel.me and then manage routing on your internal network? On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 7:45 AM Marcus Daniels wrote: > Hi, > > > > The following seems like it is simple thing to

[FRIAM] virtualized public IPs

2018-08-21 Thread Marcus Daniels
Hi, The following seems like it is simple thing to address, but it doesn’t seem common. Here are my assumptions: 1) I have several computers configured in complicated ways that I’d like to keep under my physical control. 2) I have an ordinary residential type of internet connection with one