> > One word. Ok two;
> > Driving Test.
> >
> > Do you have a driving license?
> > Did you buy it from a shop or did you have to demonstrate
> > an acceptable level of competence?
> >
> > Who administers it?
>
> Holy Crap. You've got to be kidding. What an insane analogy.
Totally, to most of yo
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Steve Wray wrote:
> One word. Ok two;
> Driving Test.
>
> Do you have a driving license?
> Did you buy it from a shop or did you have to demonstrate
> an acceptable level of competence?
>
> Who administers it?
Holy Crap. You've got to be kidding. What an insane analogy.
Fi
One word. Ok two;
Driving Test.
Do you have a driving license?
Did you buy it from a shop or did you have to demonstrate
an acceptable level of competence?
Who administers it?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of yossarian
> Sent: Mond
Steve Wray wrote
>So demonstrate to your ISP that you are competent.
>Whats wrong with that?
There is a lot wrong wit that. Maybe not at first sight.
Why should I prove anything? Who is competent to be the judge? And, what is
worse, demonstrate my skills on what? Suppose I am very competent in s
So demonstrate to your ISP that you are competent.
Whats wrong with that?
And if someone isn't competent and doesn't get an
open pipe internet connection and doesn't get their
IIS server infected with nimda W HOOO FANTASTIC!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[E
* yossarian wrote on Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 19:52 +0100:
> My question - must my ISP know all types of traffic legit to me, in order to
> service me?
I don't think they can. Maybe they can serve AOL customers
without any requirements except high color depth, but for people
that work with the net, t
But if things carry on the way they are, ISPs are going
to be required, by law, to restrict access to the internet.
Once upon a time, the internet community was a closed circle,
if someone on the internet released a worm or something
that closed the net down, it only affected that small
circle of
[Full-Disclosure] Mailing List Charter
John Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Len Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Introduction & Purpose
--
This document serves as a charter for the [Full-Disclosure] mailing
list hosted at lists.netsys.com.
The list was created on 9th July 2002
ok so how about some sort of 'driving test'
for internet access?
Proposed Scenario;
ISPs will give you unfiltered internet access if you can
pass a basic test demonstrating your ability to stop your
machine from being used to mess up internet access for others.
(Ok so MS engineers would probably *
PS wrote:
> All this is well and good, but I have a really hard time understanding
> why we need to route insecure networking protocols such as NetBIOS,
> CIFS, NFS or NIS across the Internet. Just closing those ports would do
> a world of good for the Internet as a whole, and who in the world wou
Schmehl, Paul L wrote:
..snip...
Are you really willing to demand your "freedom" in the face of the
overwhelming odds that leaving those ports open will do more harm than
good?
I am willing to demand my freedom.
When I pay to an ISP for internet, I want to have all ports in/out working.
If I do
On 09 Feb 2003 at 21:53 +0100, Schmehl, Paul L wrote:
> This analogy is false.
For sure it is not 100% true, as all analogies aren't.
> Your phone calls do not affect my ability to connect to the
> telephone company, nor to do they take down my phone system.
If I'm attacking your line or telco
On 09 Feb 2003 at 20:36 +0100, Schmehl, Paul L wrote:
> All this is well and good, but I have a really hard time
> understanding why we need to route insecure networking protocols
> such as NetBIOS, CIFS, NFS or NIS across the Internet. Just
> closing those ports would do a world of good for the I
PS wrote
>> Can you think of a legitimate reason why ISPs should allow
>> ports 135-139/TCP/UDP to be open to the Internet? How about
>> port 445/UDP? Many ISPs now block port 25/TCP (for obvious
>> reasons.) Why not other service ports?
SD wrote
>Are that InternetServiceProviders or InternetSe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
###
/usr/games/lib/nethackdir/nethack - LOCALLY EXPLOITABLE BUFFER
try th1s: nethack -s `perl -e "print 'A' x 1000"`
nethack.RPM package for redhat 8 is installed SETUID GAMES!@)~*
ther pre compiled b1nz for c
15 matches
Mail list logo
