It's Symantec. SF anything is not worth it anymore. Just more of
the same big corp bowing to MS and the other non-full-disclosure companies.
They say one thing and do another. They boast that they haven't changed
anything, but it sure FEELS like they haveto many!
-Original Mess
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Curt Purdy wrote:
> I'm still subscribed to several securityfocus lists, but have not
> submitted for some time as I kept getting returned rejects even though
> they were on-topic valid points. A real shame but not unusual for big-$
> corporate America to get their grubby litt
At 02:55 PM 10/27/03 -0600, Curt Purdy wrote:
I'm still subscribed to several securityfocus lists, but have not submitted
for some time as I kept getting returned rejects even though they were
on-topic valid points.
I changed email addresses about ten months ago. I unsubscribed
from the dozen or s
David M wrote:
> Once upon a time, pre-symantec it seems, it used to be a viable and
> pertinent list. I'm debating unsubscribing, since it's down
> to maybe a dozen
> posts a week at this point and just doesn't seem worth the
> effort to read
> posts that are 3, even 4, days old.
I'm still subsc
