Re: [funsec] simple question

2009-12-05 Thread Tomas L. Byrnes
However, the existence of evidence of active collusion, suppression and destruction of evidence, and out and out awful code with variable assignment without proper type conversion errors that effectively result in random number generation: http://di2.nu/foia/HARRY_READ_ME-0.html Do undermine the

Re: [funsec] simple question

2009-12-05 Thread Tomas L. Byrnes
All or None, depending on whether Angels are elemental or purely spiritual. The properties of Angels is the matter that remains of debate, not their relationship to a sophist question. Modern Mathematics and Physics have many such questions. Is the universe finite or infinite? If finite

Re: [funsec] Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate!

2009-12-05 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:56:03 EST, Wes Deviers said: > I think he was referring to the idea that previously rural senors are > becoming > urban without necessarily taking that into account when you look at the data. > > For instance, say you have 30 weather stations along the stretch of 81 > bet

[funsec] Dr Solly triumphant

2009-12-05 Thread David Harley
:) http://avien.net/blog/?p=175 -- David Harley BA CISSP FBCS CITP Director of Malware Intelligence, ESET ___ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing

Re: [funsec] Dr Solly triumphant

2009-12-05 Thread Larry Seltzer
Hip hip hoorah for the Doctor! Larry Seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larry_selt...@ziffdavis.com http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ -Original Message- From: funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org] On Behalf Of David Harley Sent: Saturday, December 05,

Re: [funsec] Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate!

2009-12-05 Thread Martin Tomasek
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=359423 > Graph at the end of page reminded me of this report from surfacestations.org: http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/surfacestationsreport_spring09.pdf > Of course, it's exactly these sort of c

Re: [funsec] simple question

2009-12-05 Thread RandallM
> > From: funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org] On > Behalf Of Martin Tomasek > Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 2:33 AM > To: Drsolly > Cc: funsec; RandallM > Subject: Re: [funsec] simple question > > > > Drsolly wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, RandallM wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [funsec] simple question

2009-12-05 Thread Martin Tomasek
Tomas L. Byrnes napsal(a): Hence we return you to my focus: the code. Code does not lie, it merely does what it was told. By my reading, the CRU code produces ever more excited random numbers. Someone else please read it and prove me wrong. Quote from docs: "Had to make some changes t

Re: [funsec] simple question

2009-12-05 Thread Tomas L. Byrnes
Yes, and it you look at the real to integer, and integer to real, assignments without conversion functions, you can see where the actual assignment may be indeterminate. I don't have the datasets, and haven't done Fortran since F77, but when I did Fortran, assignment without type conversion produce

Re: [funsec] simple question

2009-12-05 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:33:42 PST, "Tomas L. Byrnes" said: > Yes, and it you look at the real to integer, and integer to real, > assignments without conversion functions, you can see where the actual > assignment may be indeterminate. I don't have the datasets, and haven't > done Fortran since F77,