Two Articles of Economic Rights Responsibilities, again

2000-01-07 Thread WesBurt
Hi folks, Here's the third of three you missed. Yours for the New Year, WesBurt ~ Subj: Two Articles of Economic Rights Responsibilities Date: 01/05/2000 10:25:39 AM Eastern Standard Time From: WesBurt CC:WesBurt BCC: deleted by WSB Hi

Re: rights/responsibilities(Tor)

1998-09-27 Thread Steve Kurtz
One important clarification: TF: It is certainly not right to construct a conflict between social justice and ecological concerns! SK: I don't think it is a construction; rather it is reality - the result of very rapid growth both in human numbers and in the impacts of rapid technological

Re: rights/responsibilities

1998-09-26 Thread Tor Forde
Steve Kurtz wrote: Dear Thomas, Your axe is social justice; mine is long term habitat health and minimization of scarcity induced conflicts. You accept the system at base, and plea for redistribution of credits. My view is equal slices of an insufficient renewable pie results in

Re: rights/responsibilities

1998-09-26 Thread Thomas Lunde
-Original Message- From: Steve Kurtz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: futurework [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: September 25, 1998 11:35 AM Subject: Re: rights/responsibilities Dear Thomas, Thomas: Come on guys having a piss requires "human actions". At some future date, if you live long e

Re: rights/responsibilities

1998-09-25 Thread Steve Kurtz
ledgement or respect? Self-valued (subjective) actions can be in isolation, but only a hermit would exist without the interdependency of community (incl family, tribe). You are assuming either/or; I didn't claim that. An interdependence of 'subjects'(people) is a dynamic of rights responsibilitie

Re: rights/responsibilities

1998-09-24 Thread Steve Kurtz
Greetings, I received one response off list which I will share with you. The author wishes to remain anonymous, having insufficient time to engage in ongoing discussions. Steve Kurtz - Dear Steve, Thanks for your posting Re: rights

Re: rights/responsibilities

1998-09-22 Thread Thomas Lunde
] To: futurework [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: September 22, 1998 1:58 PM Subject: rights/responsibilities Greetings, Rather than attempt a detailed refutation of parts of Thomas Lunde's post of today, I'm merely going to point out a few things (once again) that this list seems resigned to ignore. Work, a form

Re: rights/responsibilities

1998-09-22 Thread Steve Kurtz
Thomas Lunde wrote: ( by the way, I see this as the implied question, Does or should everyone have to work?) Since I define work as required human actions, my answer is YES. ... to exist is to engage in work. A passive, vegetative human cannot survive for many days independently; so