Greetings,
Rather than attempt a detailed refutation of parts of Thomas Lunde's post
of today, I'm merely going to point out a few things (once again) that this
list seems resigned to ignore.
Work, a form of human action, involves intention, motivation, purpose.
Otherwise it would be described a
gt;
To: futurework <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: September 22, 1998 1:58 PM
Subject: rights/responsibilities
>Greetings,
>
>Rather than attempt a detailed refutation of parts of Thomas Lunde's post
>of today, I'm merely going to point out a few things (once again) that this
>l
Thomas Lunde wrote:
> ( by the way, I see this as the
> implied question, Does or should everyone have to work?)
Since I define work as required human actions, my answer is YES.
> ... to exist is to engage in work.
A passive, vegetative human cannot survive for many days independently; so
so
Greetings,
I received one response off list which I will share with you. The author
wishes to remain anonymous, having insufficient time to engage in ongoing
discussions.
Steve Kurtz
-
Dear Steve,
Thanks for your posting Re: rights
s." What are we, a bunch of sheep that have to be so
> constrained that any action outside of communitarian responsibilites should
> be punished by no rewards, acknowledgement or respect?
Self-valued (subjective) actions can be in isolation, but only a hermit
would exist with
Steve Kurtz wrote:
>
> Dear Thomas,
>
>
> Your axe is social justice; mine is long term habitat health and
> minimization of scarcity induced conflicts. You accept the system at base,
> and plea for redistribution of credits. My view is equal slices of an
> insufficient renewable pie results i
-Original Message-
From: Steve Kurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: futurework <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: September 25, 1998 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: rights/responsibilities
>Dear Thomas,
>
>> Thomas: Come on guys having a piss requires "human actions".
>
&
eful as part of the solution to the human predicament. You disagree.
> >> That a person cannot
> >> have or perform valuable actions independant of "communitarian
> >> responsibilities." What are we, a bunch of sheep that have to be so
> >> constrained that any
Dear Tor,
Thank you for commenting. Any snow yet in your area? A light frost here a
few days ago.
I'll try to better explain my position.
> It is certainly not right to construct a conflict between social justice
> and ecological concerns!
I don't think it is a construction; rather it is real
One important clarification:
TF:
> It is certainly not right to construct a conflict between social justice
> and ecological concerns!
SK:
I don't think it is a construction; rather it is reality - the result of
very rapid growth both in human numbers and in the impacts of rapid
technological ch
Hi folks,
Here's the third of three you missed.
Yours for the New Year,
WesBurt
~
Subj: Two Articles of Economic Rights & Responsibilities
Date: 01/05/2000 10:25:39 AM Eastern Standard Time
From: WesBurt
CC:WesBurt
BCC: deleted b
11 matches
Mail list logo
