t the relationship between the proposed socket and
the .so would be to blackbox the socket, as with X, so that users
simply initialize with a C (or whatever) API call like XOpenDisplay()
and go from there, and the .so takes care of actual communication
via socket (or, possibly, initi
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:46:34 +
Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:22:41AM -0500, MK wrote:
> > WRT asciidoc, Thomas mentions stuff "within the Documentation/
> > directory", but I don't know what this refers to (there is no such
> > director
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:45:07 +
Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:23:03AM -0500, MK wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:06:46 +
> > Thomas Adam wrote:
> > > * Style clean-up (Difficulty: Easy):
> > >
> > > This would involve t
xml.
WRT asciidoc, Thomas mentions stuff "within the Documentation/
directory", but I don't know what this refers to (there is no such
directory in the 2.6.4 source). In any case, I would think that it
should not be hard to parse/scrape/whatever the existing docs into a
NAME, SYNOPSIS, DESCRIPTION pattern, rather than do it all manually.
MK
--
"Enthusiasm is not the enemy of the intellect." (said of Irving Howe)
"The angel of history[...]is turned toward the past." (Walter Benjamin)
s huge though, and would need more discussion.
It implies to me a lot of drastic changes to the way the way the
configuration is currently. Are you sure that is a good idea?
MK
--
"Enthusiasm is not the enemy of the intellect." (said of Irving Howe)
"The angel of history[...]is turned toward the past." (Walter Benjamin)
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:49:18 +
Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:15:21AM -0500, MK wrote:
> > Hey gang. I'll be eligible for GSOC this year. I recall that
> > Thomas has been interested previously, but did not get the
> > application in or did not
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:15:42 +
Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 01:49:18PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > MK, I'd appreciate it if you'd search the mailing list archives for
> > the last time this was discussed, and to reference where I talked
> >
Hey gang. I'll be eligible for GSOC this year. I recall that Thomas
has been interested previously, but did not get the application in or
did not qualify.
I'm not familiar with the fvwm source, but it's been my WM of choice
for about a decade, I work a lot in C, and have done a few very minor
th
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:58:04 -0500
des...@verizon.net wrote:
> MK writes:
> Try:
>
> sudo chvt 1
I usually run as root -- and no, I don't need a lecture about it ;)
--
MK
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:39:46 -0500
des...@verizon.net wrote:
> Also check your xmodmap settings.
>
> Try:
>
> xmodmap -pke
xmodmap is set okay. chvt doesn't work tho. Hmphh.
--
MK
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:16:42 -0500
des...@verizon.net wrote:
> In the man page you will see the section "Builtin Key and Mouse
> Bindings".
>
> You will also see:
>
> Key Tab A M -
Thanks!
--
MK
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 16:04:19 +
Thomas Adam wrote:
> It's a setting for X11 -- nothing to do with FVWM. Read your
> xorg.conf manpage.
Yeah, DontVTSwitch is not set anywhere, I am just trying to rule out
possible causes.
--
MK
Recently alt-ctrl F1-8 to drop into a VT stopped working; I don't use
this everyday so I am not sure when, but I believe it was after
installing 2.5.28 -- going back to 2.5.26 didn't help tho, so I am not
sure.
Have there been any reports of this?
--
MK
.
--
MK
to start asking pesky source code
> > questions?
>
> fvwm-work...@fvwm.org
>
Thanks -- prepare to be pestered :D
--
MK
to poking around in the code a little
bit this afternoon. I notice fvwm does not have a "devel" mailing list
-- is this the appropriate place to start asking pesky source code
questions?
--
MK
ist are you referring to here: the one that
comes with the 2.5.28 source? Or something more recent?
--
MK
as a place to start exploring the project (which I've always
been a fan of).
> This wasn't an invitation to reply off-list, either. Do pleas check in
> future.
That was unintentional, not checking my "reply to", sorry Thomas. Hopefully I
am not always that incompetent ;)
--
MK
is already
in the window does not count, since we cannot be continually sending this
signal -- it only happens when the mouse enters (SloppyFocus) or you click
inside.
--
MK
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:48:22 +
Thomas Adam wrote:
> 2009/12/8 MK :
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:45:39 +
> > Thomas Adam wrote:
> >> 2009/12/8 Peter Daum :
> >> > larger display. With the newer graphics card/driver, the "virtual"
> >> &
virtual viewport! And the thing has a cooling fan and
1Gb of memory on it!
None of the big DE's -- KDE, gnome, XFCE -- (or the WM's they use) support it,
no matter what your hardware. I guess the idea just never caught on well
enough, and is slowly becoming obsolete. Call it "devolution".
--
MK
21 matches
Mail list logo
