On Mon, 20 May 2002, Stephen Dennison wrote:
> Is there really no one on the list who can help me?
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2002, Stephen Dennison wrote:
>
> > When fvwm starts up, I can see the background being set, I see the
> > applications start up for the pager, and then they are swallowed by t
I sort my windowlist by class before sorting by name.
I also print that class.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19 May 2002 17:34:07 -0700, Robert L. Knighten wrote:
>
> Mikhael Goikhman writes:
> > On 19 May 2002 20:16:21 +0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
> > >
> > > I run fvwm 2.5.1
> > > My pager always has the window title "Desk 0", regardless of desk.
> > But you may have any title you want,
Hello again. Two small questions.
Firstly, I'm using this setup,
mouse 1 w m function alt-move
destroyfunc alt-move
addtofunc alt-move
+ m move
which allows me to move a window by clicking and dragging from anywhere
within it, u
On 20 May 2002 00:25:45 -0700, elliot sowadsky wrote:
>
> I sort my windowlist by class before sorting by name.
> I also print that class.
Elliot, you always mention that you run a patched windowlist.
If that or another feature is so useful to you, why not to think about
its generalization and ad
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Stian Sletner wrote:
> Hello again. Two small questions.
>
> Firstly, I'm using this setup,
>
> mouse 1 w m function alt-move
>
> destroyfunc alt-move
> addtofunc alt-move
> + m move
>
> which allows me t
* At 2002-05-20T14:14+0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
:
| I can confirm this.
| I thought disaster was that fvwm crashed until I tried this myself (and I
| use SloppyFocus). This crashes my machine...
| I would think this is a serious bug.
Wow. I just meant that I don't get to the window I wanted.
On 20 May 2002 14:14:54 +0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, Stian Sletner wrote:
>
> > Hello again. Two small questions.
> >
> > Firstly, I'm using this setup,
> >
> > mouse 1 w m function alt-move
> >
> > destroyfunc alt-move
> > addtofu
Marcus Lundblad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, Stephen Dennison wrote:
>
> > Is there really no one on the list who can help me?
> >
> > On Thu, 16 May 2002, Stephen Dennison wrote:
> >
> > > When fvwm starts up, I can see the background being set, I see the
> > > application
* At 2002-05-20T12:55+, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
:
| I can only suggest:
|
| Style * ClickToFocusPassesClickOff
|
| This should solve your problem, but I am not sure this is what you want.
| If a click on ClickToFocus window is passed to an application, unexpected
| things may happen. Maybe
On 16 May 2002 16:02:29 -0400, Stephen Dennison wrote:
>
> When fvwm starts up, I can see the background being set, I see the
> applications start up for the pager, and then they are swallowed by the
> pager and somewhere along the way the banner pops up just before Fvwm is
> done loading.
You pr
I wouldn't want to see the class name, but sorting by class does sound
better except it wouldn't distinguish between a terminal and the
terminal running vim which you could by my method.
Please do include a patch.
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 11:58:55AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 20 May 2002
On 20 May 2002 11:28:44 -0500, David Fries wrote:
>
> I wouldn't want to see the class name, but sorting by class does sound
> better except it wouldn't distinguish between a terminal and the
> terminal running vim which you could by my method.
I don't think there is a case that is handled better
< | I can confirm this.
< | I thought disaster was that fvwm crashed until I tried this myself (and I
< | use SloppyFocus). This crashes my machine...
< | I would think this is a serious bug.
<
< Wow. I just meant that I don't get to the window I wanted. :-D
Worse yetwhen he tried itit
On 20 May 2002 15:16:25 +0200, Stian Sletner wrote:
>
> * At 2002-05-20T12:55+, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> :
> > > mouse 1 w m function alt-move
> > >
> > > destroyfunc alt-move
> > > addtofunc alt-move
> > > + m move
> >
> |
* At 2002-05-20T18:57+, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
:
| > > > mouse 1 w m function alt-move
| > > >
| > > > destroyfunc alt-move
| > > > addtofunc alt-move
| > > > + m move
:
| I think it is a bug that with unfocussed ClickToFocu
Is there a way to get a window decor button that is tied to a menu to not
remain pressed in when the mouse button is released, althogh the menu is
still posted? (this is the way it behaves in mwm)
Maybe this should be implied by Style MWMButtons
//Marcus
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at ht
On 20 May 2002 21:30:45 +0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
>
> Is there a way to get a window decor button that is tied to a menu to not
> remain pressed in when the mouse button is released, althogh the menu is
> still posted? (this is the way it behaves in mwm)
> Maybe this should be implied by Style
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 20 May 2002 21:30:45 +0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
> >
> > Is there a way to get a window decor button that is tied to a menu to not
> > remain pressed in when the mouse button is released, althogh the menu is
> > still posted? (this is the way
On 20 May 2002 22:44:53 +0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
>
> > On 20 May 2002 21:30:45 +0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there a way to get a window decor button that is tied to a menu to not
> > > remain pressed in when the mouse button i
> When a menu is activated, no buttons may be pressed/depressed.
> So a menu button should be depressed either before a menu started or
> after it is closed.
>
> > selecting an entry in the menu it's operation are not directly applied to
> > the window in question, instead the pointer changes to
With sloppy focus some windows doesn't take focus (like xclock).
By turning on Style * Lenience this is overriden, but not for fvwm
tear-off menus.
I know most people prefer not to have windows that you don't type in
"steal" focus, but I prefer to have them change to focused so I can
easier see whe
> I know most people prefer not to have windows that you don't type in
> "steal" focus, but I prefer to have them change to focused so I can
> easier see where my pointer is.
It seems like several times a day I have trouble figuring out where
the pointer has ended up, even when it's in a focused w
On 21 May 2002 00:02:02 +0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
>
> With sloppy focus some windows doesn't take focus (like xclock).
> By turning on Style * Lenience this is overriden, but not for fvwm
> tear-off menus.
> I know most people prefer not to have windows that you don't type in
> "steal" focus,
On 20 May 2002 15:19:42 -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote:
>
> > I know most people prefer not to have windows that you don't type in
> > "steal" focus, but I prefer to have them change to focused so I can
> > easier see where my pointer is.
>
> It seems like several times a day I have trouble figurin
Hi,
I use ROX-Filer to get desktop icons in Fvwm. But the trouble is that the
windows appear below the layer on which the icons are so the icons are on the
top. How can I make ROX-Filer always start on the lowest layer? The application
name is rox. But in the process list, it shows up as ROX-Fil
26 matches
Mail list logo
