On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 07:47:03PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
Hello,
I have a very naive Xinerama question:
Is it possible to send to modules a M_NEW_SCREEN message
On 08 Aug 2001 14:57:41 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 04:45:34AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
In any way, this solution is more clean and extendible than the Dominik's
one and it does not change any existing syntax.
Hm. I'd really prefer a solution that is
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
Well,
Some users may want to have an application which is always on the
current screen. Typically, if I get a double head I would like to
have my FvwmPager and my WLM (TaskBar, WinList, IconMan or IconBox)
always in the current screen. The
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 09:37:50PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
Well,
Some users may want to have an application which is always on the
current screen. Typically, if I get a double head I would like to
have my FvwmPager and my WLM
But it would certainly be a useful addition to the Xinerama extension to
send EnterXineramaHead and LeaveXineramaHead events - IIRC X
extensions can introduce new events. If these events contain the a
head number, interested applications can then easily maintain
information
about the
On 08 Aug 2001 21:29:50 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 08:14:01PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Is it really necessary to pass function return codes through
global variables? If we do this now we will regret it
On 09 Aug 2001 17:35:57 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
I'd rather rewrite the syntax 20 commands than extend the command
parser in such a way. Currently it is *the* worst piece of fvwm
code: not extensible, hard to understand, undpredictable, buggy.
I am not sure why do you think so. I see no
