CVS domivogt: * Committed missing files.

2002-01-29 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt02/01/29 17:54:30 Added files: fvwm : schedule.c schedule.h Log message: * Committed missing files. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, s

CVS domivogt: * Fixed MouseFocus.

2002-01-29 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt02/01/29 17:53:46 Modified files: . : ChangeLog fvwm : commands.h functions.c functions.h fvwm2.1 misc.c Log message: * Fixed MouseFocus. * Added

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Paul Smith
%% Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mikhael> This is not correct. It is standard for unux kernels to pass Mikhael> a text executable script to /bin/sh by default. ak> LIE. Read standards, please. Single UNIX says: If the process image file is not a valid executable obj

CVS domivogt: * New command "Schedule" that executes commands delayed. May be used to

2002-01-29 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt02/01/29 16:37:16 Modified files: . : ChangeLog NEWS fvwm : Makefile.am commands.h events.c functions.c functions.h fvwm2.1 icccm2.c misc.c misc.h

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Paul Smith
%% Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> It's a good idea, but not necessary. If there is no known magic value Paul> at the beginning of the file then the kernel just gives it to /bin/sh. ak> kernel? shell I think. I don't know what you mean. It's the kernel, typically,

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:49:22 + > "Mikhael" == Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mikhael> Mikhael> On 30 Jan 2002 00:39:19 +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:47:09 -0500 >> > "Dan" == Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dan> Dan> Why

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 30 Jan 2002 00:39:19 +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:47:09 -0500 > > "Dan" == Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan> > Dan> Why put #! > Because not putting it in is out of standards. E.g. you are not able > to call exec funcitions on this script.

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:47:09 -0500 > "Dan" == Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dan> Dan> Why put #!http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
> On 29 Jan 2002 12:03:00 -0500 > "Paul" == Paul Smith wrote: Paul> Paul> %% Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ak> I always thought, that it is supposed, that all scripts have ak> #! ak> as the first line Paul> Paul> It's a good idea, but not necessary. If there is no kn

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 07:46:46PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote: > Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 07:29:19PM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: > > > > > Content-Description: patch to make fvwm survive with SIGTTIN > > > (and actually other signals from exec'ed prog

CVS domivogt fvwm-web: * Added link to Jitterbug login page.

2002-01-29 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm-web Changes by: domivogt02/01/29 14:26:02 Modified files: . : downloadbugs.html Log message: * Added link to Jitterbug login page. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe fr

CVS domivogt: * Added checks for setpgrp and setpgid.

2002-01-29 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt02/01/29 14:22:52 Modified files: . : ChangeLog configure.in docs : ChangeLog FAQ fvwm : builtins.c libs : Makefile.am Added files:

Re: perl invocation

2002-01-29 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 29 Jan 2002 13:14:42 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > %% Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > mg> Well, the following is even better if we want the first perl in $PATH: > > mg> #!/usr/bin/env perl > > Unfortunately you can't rely on env always being in /usr/bin. There > most a

Re: perl invocation

2002-01-29 Thread Paul Smith
%% Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: mg> Well, the following is even better if we want the first perl in $PATH: mg> #!/usr/bin/env perl Unfortunately you can't rely on env always being in /usr/bin. There most assuredly are systems where it isn't. Catch-22. -- ---

Re: CVS domivogt: * New commands Any and PointerWindow.

2002-01-29 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 03:40:56PM +, Tim Phipps wrote: > fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote: > > > Log message: > > * New commands Any and PointerWindow. > > > So what's the difference between Any and Next? Um, er, let me think... Ah, yes. Line None, Any is executed in the C_ROOT context while

perl invocation

2002-01-29 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 29 Jan 2002 11:19:45 -0500, Dan Espen wrote: > > Olivier Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dan, > > > > Why do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ as with the other perl scripts? > > At least my emacs recognize this. Your do not? > > Mine doesn't but I know how to fix it so it would. > That woul

Re: redesign of wire frame move/resize look?

2002-01-29 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 10:32:16AM -0500, Charles Hines wrote: > > "DV" == Dominik Vogt writes: > > DV> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:13:14PM +0600, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote: > >> > >> > Um, I wanted to suggest to remove the lines inside the

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Paul Smith
%% Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ak> I always thought, that it is supposed, that all scripts have ak> #! ak> as the first line It's a good idea, but not necessary. If there is no known magic value at the beginning of the file then the kernel just gives it to /bin/sh. -

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Dan Espen
Olivier Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dan, > > Why do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ as with the other perl scripts? > At least my emacs recognize this. Your do not? Mine doesn't but I know how to fix it so it would. That would still leave other users without automatic perl mode. I don't see

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Dan Espen
Tim Phipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >># -*-perl-*- > >>Dan> That line is in the file in order to make emacs go into perl mode. > > The disadvantage of the "#!" line is that it contains a hard-coded > > path. O

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Olivier Chapuis
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 10:05:45AM -0500, Dan Espen wrote: > Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:04:57 -0500 > > > "Dan" == Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dan> > > Dan> Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > On Tue,

Re: CVS domivogt: * New commands Any and PointerWindow.

2002-01-29 Thread Tim Phipps
fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote: Log message: * New commands Any and PointerWindow. So what's the difference between Any and Next? Cheers, Tim. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to

Re: redesign of wire frame move/resize look?

2002-01-29 Thread Charles Hines
> "DV" == Dominik Vogt writes: DV> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:13:14PM +0600, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote: >> >> > Um, I wanted to suggest to remove the lines inside the window. ... >> > +---+ >> > | | | | >> > +---+

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Tim Phipps
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: # -*-perl-*- Dan> That line is in the file in order to make emacs go into perl mode. The disadvantage of the "#!" line is that it contains a hard-coded path. On my HP-UX machine, Perl is not in /usr/bin. In fvwm

Re: czech keyboard and fvwm

2002-01-29 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 03:31:50PM +0100, Jan Martinek wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 06:10:36PM +0100, Jan Martinek wrote: > > > > Please always reply to our mailing list, no to me personally. > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 05:09:31PM +0100, Jan Martinek wrote: > > > > > Hello, >

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Dan Espen
Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:04:57 -0500 > > "Dan" == Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan> > Dan> Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:03:12 -0500 > >> > "Dan" == Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: CVS olicha: * Use gnu libiconv in priority against the system iconv

2002-01-29 Thread Tim Phipps
fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote: Log message: * Use gnu libiconv in priority against the system iconv Thanks, all my UTF error messages have gone. Cheers, Tim. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:04:57 -0500 > "Dan" == Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dan> Dan> Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:03:12 -0500 >> > "Dan" == Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dan> Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

CVS olicha fvwm-web: * Documented the MX_PROPERTY_CHANGE and MX_VISIBLE* messages

2002-01-29 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm-web Changes by: olicha 02/01/29 07:17:49 Modified files: . : ChangeLog mod_f2m_communication.html mod_initialization.html Log message: * Documented the MX_PROPERTY_CHANGE and MX_VISIBLE* messa

Re: changes to fvwm that have not been included in 2.4.5 for unknown reasons

2002-01-29 Thread Dan Espen
Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:03:12 -0500 > > "Dan" == Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan> Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:46:46 -0500 > >> > "Dan" == Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

CVS olicha: * Use gnu libiconv in priority against the system iconv

2002-01-29 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: olicha 02/01/29 06:20:28 Modified files: . : ChangeLog configure.in acinclude.m4 Log message: * Use gnu libiconv in priority against the system iconv * Better test for iconv second argument -- Visit the of

Re: multibyte redesign

2002-01-29 Thread Olivier Chapuis
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:23:56AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > Olivier, since you plan to rewrite the infamous multibyte support, > do you already have a design in mind? I already spent some though > on that topic and concluded that font and string objects should > get their own data type that is

Re: multibyte redesign

2002-01-29 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:23:56 +0100 > "Dominik" == Dominik Vogt wrote: Dominik> Dominik> Olivier, since you plan to rewrite the infamous multibyte support, Dominik> do you already have a design in mind? I already spent some though Dominik> on that topic and concluded that font and strin

multibyte redesign

2002-01-29 Thread Dominik Vogt
Olivier, since you plan to rewrite the infamous multibyte support, do you already have a design in mind? I already spent some though on that topic and concluded that font and string objects should get their own data type that is managed exclusively in a library module. So in the end the only ifde

Re: redesign of wire frame move/resize look?

2002-01-29 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:13:14PM +0600, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > Um, I wanted to suggest to remove the lines inside the window. > > > > Now: > > > > +---+ > > | | | | > > +---+ > > | | | | > > +-

Re: redesign of wire frame move/resize look?

2002-01-29 Thread Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote: > Um, I wanted to suggest to remove the lines inside the window. > > Now: > > +---+ > | | | | > +---+ > | | | | > +---+ > | | | | > +---+ > > After the suggested change: > > +---+