Hi Dominik,
Are you enjoying the World Cup?
Two reasons: (1) Schedule is an unreliable hack and (2) this
starts a shell every 15 seconds and my goal was to waste as little
cpu as possible (as it interferes with certain time-critical
applications - okay - games).
Hehe. :)
Re: (2)
From
Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 07:18:30PM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
Having just looked into how Schedule execute_complex_function() work,
I'm not prepared to blame Schedule just yet.
In my opinion, I don't think FVWM should grab the X server everytime it
executes a complex
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 02:09:49PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Is it not possible to determine whether a function must grab as it is
defined? Couldn't adding a line with a modifier that needs a grab set
a this function might need a grab flag?
You want to read this thread (it's long):
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:30:17AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
It actually wasn't this bad. The idea behing the test in the
ButtonReleasee handler was to make sure the window is snapped if
the window did not move before, but the pointer position in the
release event moved the window.
In my
Hi Dominik,
That's just one purpose of the command. I was always fond of the
idea to prototype or even implement modules as shell scripts.
Yes, that would be cool. IMHO, I think it would be prudent to create
bashlib (akin to perllib), instead of adding ModuleListenOnly command.
But I
Hi Dominik et al,
This post follows on from the previous ModuleListenOnly command
which was getting a bit off-topic.
As a hack/compromise, maybe we could modify AddToFunc to keep track
of whether or not it uses a mouse modifier only then grab the
X server, in execute_complex_function().
