nk it would be prudent to create
> "bashlib" (akin to perllib), instead of adding ModuleListenOnly command.
Well, the new command is not a big deal. I just needed to add
some code to close the fvwm_to_app pipes and modify some places to
handle the situation that there is no fvwm_to_app pi
Hi Dominik,
> That's just one purpose of the command. I was always fond of the
> idea to prototype or even implement modules as shell scripts.
Yes, that would be cool. IMHO, I think it would be prudent to create
"bashlib" (akin to perllib), instead of adding ModuleListe
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 02:09:49PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Is it not possible to determine whether a function must grab as it is
> defined? Couldn't adding a line with a modifier that needs a grab set
> a "this function might need a grab" flag?
You want to read this thread (it's long):
ht
Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 07:18:30PM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
Having just looked into how Schedule & execute_complex_function() work,
I'm not prepared to blame Schedule just yet.
In my opinion, I don't think FVWM should grab the X server everytime it
executes a complex f
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 07:18:30PM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> Are you enjoying the World Cup?
>
> > Two reasons: (1) "Schedule" is an unreliable hack and (2) this
> > starts a shell every 15 seconds and my goal was to waste as little
> > cpu as possible (as it interferes with
Hi Dominik,
Are you enjoying the World Cup?
> Two reasons: (1) "Schedule" is an unreliable hack and (2) this
> starts a shell every 15 seconds and my goal was to waste as little
> cpu as possible (as it interferes with certain time-critical
> applications - okay - games).
Hehe. :)
Re: (2)
>Fr
On 6/24/06, Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 10:09:03PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> Can we release a 2.6.0-rc1 and move on? Then while some would
> maintain it until a real 2.6.0, some would be working on 2.7. For the
> volunteers it's a matter of deciding to ei
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 10:09:03PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> Can we release a 2.6.0-rc1 and move on? Then while some would
> maintain it until a real 2.6.0, some would be working on 2.7. For the
> volunteers it's a matter of deciding to either help on perfecting
> 2.6.0 or on improving 2.7.0
On 6/24/06, Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 24 Jun 2006 16:35:21 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 02:08:43PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> >
> > I can't say I am very happy about this. Actually, I would not be happy
> > about any new feature added without d
On 24 Jun 2006 16:35:21 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 02:08:43PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> >
> > I can't say I am very happy about this. Actually, I would not be happy
> > about any new feature added without discussion before 2.6.0. :)
>
> Hm, I don't see that hap
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 03:22:57AM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
> Why use a module for something so simple?
>
> AddToFunc MyPeriodicFunc
> + I PipeRead 'echo SendToModule FvwmButtons ChangeButton clock Title $(date
> +"%R %a %d.%m.")'
> + I PipeRead 'str=$(/bin/ps -A --format "%C %P %c" | sort -n
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 03:22:57AM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
> > We may write a module FvwmButtonsUpdater that gets an FvwmButtons module
> > name (alias) and a list of entries, each is: a button id, its update
> > frequency and a shell command to invoke for title updates (for example,
> > 'date
> + I PipeRead 'str=$(/bin/ps -A --format "%C %P %c" | sort -n -r | tail -n1)
Sorry, that should be 'head', of course. (or drop the '-r' flag on 'sort'.)
SCoTT. :)
Hi Dominik & Mikhael,
> We may write a module FvwmButtonsUpdater that gets an FvwmButtons module
> name (alias) and a list of entries, each is: a button id, its update
> frequency and a shell command to invoke for title updates (for example,
> 'date +%T' or 'ps -A --format "%C %P %c" | sort -n -r
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 02:08:43PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 24 Jun 2006 13:58:30 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > I have just checked in the new command ModuleListenOnly. It works
> > like Module, but fvwm does not send any messages to such a module.
> >
> > I am using it to attach
On 24 Jun 2006 13:58:30 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> I have just checked in the new command ModuleListenOnly. It works
> like Module, but fvwm does not send any messages to such a module.
>
> I am using it to attach a shell script to the module interface
> that periodically updates titles of F
I have just checked in the new command ModuleListenOnly. It works
like Module, but fvwm does not send any messages to such a module.
I am using it to attach a shell script to the module interface
that periodically updates titles of FvwmButtons to display a clock
(in the format I prefer, xclock is
17 matches
Mail list logo
