A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim
mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support
completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the
FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just causing trouble.
Reasoning:
* Most of the EWMH features are intende
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:41:54PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim
> mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support
> completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the
> FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just ca
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:41:54PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim
> mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support
> completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the
> FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just
Dominik Vogt spake unto us the following wisdom:
> A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim
> mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support
> completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the
> FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just causing troub
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:41:54PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim
> mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support
> completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the
> FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just
Dominik Vogt a écrit :
A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim
mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support
completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the
FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just causing trouble.
Reasoning:
* Most of the
Dominik Vogt wrote:
> A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim
> mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support
> completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the
> FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just causing trouble.
>
> Reasoning:
>
> * Mos
On 2006-03-12 23:59, Ethan Blanton uttered these thoughts:
> Dominik Vogt spake unto us the following wisdom:
> > A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim
> > mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support
> > completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it ha
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:58:44PM +0100, Patrick B??rjesson wrote:
> > If there is a bug or misfeature which should be fixed, I would like to
> > know so that I can make sure it is addressed.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1455264&forum_id=665
>
After reading that thread,
> A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim
> mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support
> completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the
> FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just causing trouble.
I remember anxiously waiting for fvwm to bet
Patrick Börjesson spake unto us the following wisdom:
> > If there is a bug or misfeature which should be fixed, I would like to
> > know so that I can make sure it is addressed.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1455264&forum_id=665
Ahh, this is actually a common problem for u
Ethan Blanton a écrit :
Patrick Börjesson spake unto us the following wisdom:
If there is a bug or misfeature which should be fixed, I would like to
know so that I can make sure it is addressed.
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1455264&forum_id=665
Ahh, this is actually a c
Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom:
> Ethan Blanton a écrit :
> >Patrick Börjesson spake unto us the following wisdom:
> >
> >>>If there is a bug or misfeature which should be fixed, I would like to
> >>>know so that I can make sure it is addressed.
> >>
> >>http://sourceforge.net/f
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:41:54PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim
> mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support
> completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the
> FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just
Dominik Vogt a écrit :
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:41:54PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim
mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support
completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the
FULLSCREEN stuff. Every
Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom:
> Now a note on _NET_CURRENT_DESKTOP (and _NET_DESKTOP_VIEW PORT), the
> EWMH spec says that this property (as a client msg) is for a pager. Thus
> if gtk_window_present() uses this property (and one may understand that
> it uses it in the *view o
Ethan Blanton a écrit :
Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom:
Now a note on _NET_CURRENT_DESKTOP (and _NET_DESKTOP_VIEW PORT), the
EWMH spec says that this property (as a client msg) is for a pager. Thus
if gtk_window_present() uses this property (and one may understand that
it us
Before I comment specifically, I'll introduce myself. I am (at least
one) of the other gaim folk Ethan referred to. I also understand the
problems with the EWMH for window managers that don't exactly fit into
the standard paradigm, I'm an ion3 user. I am also quite interested in
getting this (a
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 11:10:00PM +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
> Ethan Blanton a écrit :
> >Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom:
> >
> >>Now a note on _NET_CURRENT_DESKTOP (and _NET_DESKTOP_VIEW PORT), the
> >>EWMH spec says that this property (as a client msg) is for a pager. Thus
Etan Reisner a écrit :
Before I comment specifically, I'll introduce myself. I am (at least
one) of the other gaim folk Ethan referred to. I also understand the
problems with the EWMH for window managers that don't exactly fit into
the standard paradigm, I'm an ion3 user. I am also quite intere
20 matches
Mail list logo
