Re: [fw-general] re: .net or zend framework?

2007-10-07 Thread Vincent
On 06/10/2007, rogeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Alex Netkachov wrote: > > > > BTW: MS will make .NET source code available to debug in next version > > of Visual Studio: http://www.alexatnet.com/node/87 > > > > I didn't know that - great move on Microsofts part! Not as great as it sou

Re: [fw-general] re: .net or zend framework?

2007-10-06 Thread Federico Galassi
On 06/ott/07, at 23:00:25, rogeson wrote: Hi Alex, Thanks for your input. I'm very familiar with all of the .Net justifications, what I'm looking for here are the benefits of PHP +ZF. I, PHP/ZF leaves you in control of situation. I don't work with .net but i had a chance to give a look at a

Re: [fw-general] re: .net or zend framework?

2007-10-06 Thread Dinh
ASP.NET is not a MVC framework. I just call it a messy framework. :D Premature open sourced software is root of evil :D Moreover, Microsoft does not open source .NET or ASP.NET , they only show some source for fun. Who cares unimportant source codes :D On 10/7/0

Re: [fw-general] re: .net or zend framework?

2007-10-06 Thread rogeson
Alex Netkachov wrote: > > BTW: MS will make .NET source code available to debug in next version > of Visual Studio: http://www.alexatnet.com/node/87 > I didn't know that - great move on Microsofts part! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/.Net-or-Zend-Framework--tf4580976

Re: [fw-general] re: .net or zend framework?

2007-10-06 Thread Karol Grecki
Alex, What's faster about .NET? Execution time? Even if that's true it hardly matters in web application. On average 95% is spend on http requests and frontend. With .NET you are more likely to end up with a bloated site, harder to tweak because you have less low level control over it. So the end

Re: [fw-general] re: .net or zend framework?

2007-10-06 Thread rogeson
Hi Alex, Thanks for your input. I'm very familiar with all of the .Net justifications, what I'm looking for here are the benefits of PHP+ZF. I, personally, have already made the decision that PHP+ZF is better for these reasons: 1. Community 2. Platform/DB independence 3. Beautiful MVC architectur

Re: [fw-general] re: .net or zend framework?

2007-10-06 Thread Martin Martinov
Yes, it's simple as hell - using .net you become a slave. ZF/php == freedom. Not to mention that IMHO php scales much better.. :) On 06/10/2007, Parnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think it is so much .Net vs ZF becaust .Net in itself is a > pretty cool framework. > > The uncool part is:

Re: [fw-general] re: .net or zend framework?

2007-10-06 Thread Alex Netkachov
On 10/6/07, Parnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think it is so much .Net vs ZF becaust .Net in itself is a > pretty cool framework. > > The uncool part is: > > A) not open source BTW: MS will make .NET source code available to debug in next version of Visual Studio: http://www.alexatnet.co

[fw-general] re: .net or zend framework?

2007-10-06 Thread Parnell
I don't think it is so much .Net vs ZF becaust .Net in itself is a pretty cool framework. The uncool part is: A) not open source B) dependent on IIS and MSSQL PHP + ZF is: A) open source (free and large community if any examples/help is needed) B) can be run in just about any server environment