Sure, I won't disagree with any of your points, but I'm choosing to not
assume anything. That's why we benchmark.
- Tony
On 9/29/2008 1:41 AM, Karol Grecki wrote:
Rendering views is usually not a bottleneck in any application.
Even if Smarty is slow, it should still account for a just a
Rendering views is usually not a bottleneck in any application.
Even if Smarty is slow, it should still account for a just a fraction of
total request time.
I'm not big on Smarty so normally I wouldn't hold you back, but I think
your intentions are misplaced.
Performance is the last thing I
It's unlikely that you will see any significant speed difference between the
two.
You're better off making sure that everything is cached properly instead of
wasting time on refactoring.
Karol
Tony Ford wrote:
We still use smarty for basic legacy reasons. I'm interested in running
some
Giant things are tens of thousands of users? :-)
We use Smarty for a variety of sites that generate a lot of traffic
(television networks, telecoms). With proper caching, it does fine. But
developer sanity suffers (for both front end and back end developers). We
have a lot of experience with
Garrison,
Good to see you on the list (we met at ZendCon)! I used to use Smarty but
stopped using it a couple of years ago. The main reason I used Smarty was to
separate display and business logic. Zend Framework's MVC components provide
the separation I need and make it so there is no reason for
We looked into using Smarty for a brand new project but determined that using
Zend_Layout with Zend_Controller MVC satisfied all our requirements re. view
separation and using templates. Also page caching with Zend_Cache works
nicely with MVC and we use a Zend_Acl based plugin for security. We
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Garrison Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this usually starts a big war, but I was just curious about how
many people out there are using Smarty and to what extent you're using it?
If you're not using it, why did you decide to not use it? If you are,
Garrison Locke wrote:
I know this usually starts a big war, but I was just curious about how
many people out there are using Smarty and to what extent you're using it?
If you're not using it, why did you decide to not use it? If you are,
why? Also, if you're using it, how big or small are the
Used it few years ago when css adoption was poor and there were no decent mvc
frameworks. Nowadays it's no longer necessary. It's also old php4 code that
I'd rather stay away from.
Karol
Garrison Locke wrote:
I know this usually starts a big war, but I was just curious about how
many
We still use smarty for basic legacy reasons. I'm interested in running
some benchmarks between zend view and smarty. If there is a significant
performance increase I'll consider refactoring all of our views over time.
I plan to do our own benchmarking in the next couple of months, so I'll
at.
,Wil
-Original Message-
From: Tony Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 2:40 PM
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Smarty Poll Question
We still use smarty for basic legacy reasons. I'm interested in
running
some benchmarks between
11 matches
Mail list logo
