The National Enquirer reports at 1:01 AM -0400 9/21/04,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 04:09 PM -0500 09/20/2004, John Slavin wrote:
I haven't own virus software for quite some time, but my wife is
attending seminary and in order to connect our iBook to the school's
network, we have to have
Kyle Hansen said:
The bus speed is the same 100mhz.
Actually is is 66mhz and not 50mhz!
http://www.lowendmac.com/pb2/ibook3.html
The system bus speed on a Pismo (powerbook FW2000) is most definitely
100MHz. You are incorrect.
But it was the iBook 500 that was said to have a bus speed of
I just went through the same ? that you are asking I had Lombard Then
I was tying to decide on the pismo or the iBook the main thing I wanted
was to run Apple DVD Player in Panther I was not sure about the Pismo
doing that one person it would then anther said it would not so that
was the
I'm surprise no one has mentioned screen size. I'm assuming the ibook
has a 12 screen and I'm assuming that the pismo has a 14 screen. I
can tell you that from first hand experience that for ordinary web
browsing, when I'm sitting on the couch at home with our ibook on one
table and the old
hehe
You know it doesn't change. It still comes down to looking at what you
need. I would have absolutely agreed with you until January two years
ago. Over the course of about a month, my eyes changed. Now my arms
are just long enough to get a piece of paper to the point where my eyes
can
Hi all
this is a quick question just to satisfy my mind.
Battery times in variuos OS, why does it vary so much? for example my
lombard in OSx.1.5 with cdrw/dvd rom (internal) fitted gives 40mins constant
use useing cds. In OS9.2.2 1hr 0mins. but in os 8.6 on the second partition
of the 20gb
On 21/09/04 11:53, vicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
this is a quick question just to satisfy my mind.
Battery times in variuos OS, why does it vary so much? for example my
lombard in OSx.1.5 with cdrw/dvd rom (internal) fitted gives 40mins constant
use useing cds. In OS9.2.2
Given the ongoing discussion re virus software: in our home, we have
three Macs on an Aiport network that connects to the internet via an
Airport Extreme Base Station. My understanding is that the Base Station
provides some level of security, inasmuch as it 'masks' our Macs behind
its IP
On Sep 21, 2004, at 10:39 AM, walter wrote:
Given the ongoing discussion re virus software: in our home, we have
three Macs on an Aiport network that connects to the internet via an
Airport Extreme Base Station. My understanding is that the Base
Station provides some level of security, inasmuch
At 06:39 PM +0100 09/21/2004, walter wrote:
Given the ongoing discussion re virus software: in our home, we have
three Macs on an Aiport network that connects to the internet via an
Airport Extreme Base Station. My understanding is that the Base
Station provides some level of security, inasmuch
At 01:50 PM -0400 09/21/2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote:
I had a number of Macs on broadband access for quite a few years now and
never had any problem.
If you have a NAT Router then your wife probably never got hit by
Blaster et al. :)
My wife, who insisted to have a PC, has all kind of
problems.
At 11:07 AM -0700 09/21/2004, Bruce Johnson wrote:
All email viruses these days come from someone you know, or someone
who has your address in their address book
Except for the ones that come via harvest lists and dictionary attacks.
- Dan.
--
G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
12 matches
Mail list logo
