At 10:27 pm +0200 8/10/04, Marcin Wichary wrote:
Was it GEM, maybe?
That was it! Thanks for jogging my memory. I then moved on to an
Acorn A5000 which had the elegant RiscOS. The old 25Mhz CPU I bought
in 1992 still boots in seconds as the OS in in ROM. Happy days.
--
With best wishes,
Roger Shu
And I was running it on a BBC Micro (back in 1984 I think) with a
second processor and some weird pre-Windows GUI the name of which
escapes me!
Was it GEM, maybe?
http://www.aci.com.pl/mwichary/guidebook/articles/historical/
romancingaclonegemsmanyfacets
Marcin Wichary
e:\> [EMAIL PROTE
Dan Palka wrote:
>You're right. Adobe InDesign IS the most terrible Quark Xpress
>wannabe ever crafted by human hands.
That viewpoint doesn't matter if you're one of the people that only need
a DTP app occasionally. If one does Indesign 2 at least is so easy to
learn and uphold that Quark looks
At 4:15 pm -0400 28/9/04, Laurent Daudelin wrote:
Of course, in reality, VP
was far from offering the flexibility and quality of PageMaker on a Mac
printed on a LaserWriter...
And I was running it on a BBC Micro (back in 1984 I think) with a
second processor and some weird pre-Windows GUI the name
On 28/09/04 15:59, "Roger Shufflebottom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 9:43 am -0500 28/9/04, Dan Palka wrote:
>> You're right. Adobe InDesign IS the most terrible Quark Xpress
>> wannabe ever crafted by human hands.
>
> Hmm - depends where you start from. I had to buy a DTP program a
> couple
At 9:43 am -0500 28/9/04, Dan Palka wrote:
You're right. Adobe InDesign IS the most terrible Quark Xpress
wannabe ever crafted by human hands.
Hmm - depends where you start from. I had to buy a DTP program a
couple of years ago and as a regular user of other Adobe products I
went for InDesign a
On Sep 28, 2004, at 9:33 AM, shane hartley wrote:
ARE YOU KIDDING! InDesign CS is the best layout program I've used and
I've
use a lot!
Well that could be your personal preference. But after you've gotten
so used to Quark, you almost feel you HAVE to use Quark out of respect
for what they've do
You're right. Adobe InDesign IS the most terrible Quark Xpress wannabe
ever crafted by human hands.
I can't believe Bradley University chose InDesign over Quark. Perhaps
they're brain dead? Probably the same people that chose Windows PCs to
replace the Macs in roughly half the Art Center.
I
se and if it
doesn't make a huge change and advancementsit will be a thing of the
past. (in my eyes it already is!)
shane
> From: Michael Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: G-Books <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:29:25 +
> To: G-Books <[
On 9/28/04 5:29 AM, "Michael Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seriously, folks, is it just me or is InDesign CS really the most awkward
> and un-intuitive Adobe product ever made ?
>
> I can't believe that I un-installed QuarkXPress for this. Nothing is where i
> expect it to be and many of t
Seriously, folks, is it just me or is InDesign CS really the most awkward
and un-intuitive Adobe product ever made ?
I can't believe that I un-installed QuarkXPress for this. Nothing is where i
expect it to be and many of the features and pallets are simply annoying.
M
_
11 matches
Mail list logo
