Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Frank P. Eigler wrote: > That I knew. I tried that one and got: > > Memory Overview: > Com_TouchMemory: 1 msec > Com_TouchMemory: 1 msec > Com_TouchMemory: 0 msec > Com_TouchMemory: 0 msec > Com_TouchMemory: 1 msec > Com_TouchMemory: 0 msec > > So, it

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

Definitely looks like system_profiler was overhauled between Jaguar and Panther Steve -- G-Books is sponsored by and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- Check our web site for refurbished PowerBooks | & CDRWs on Sale! | Su

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > On 24/06/04 14:51, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >> on 23/06/04 20:08, Frank P. Eigler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > If you don't get any error message, then it's because the c

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Steve Fuller wrote: > > On Jun 24, 2004, at 1:51 PM, Frank P. Eigler wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > > > >> on 23/06/04 20:08, Frank P. Eigler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > If you don't get any error message, then it's because the command i

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On 24/06/04 14:51, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >> on 23/06/04 20:08, Frank P. Eigler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> If you don't get any error message, then it's because the command is recognized. Now, why you don't get

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Jun 24, 2004, at 1:51 PM, Frank P. Eigler wrote: On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: on 23/06/04 20:08, Frank P. Eigler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you don't get any error message, then it's because the command is recognized. Now, why you don't get anything back, I don't know. Did y

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > on 23/06/04 20:08, Frank P. Eigler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> If you don't get any error message, then it's because the command is > >> recognized. Now, why you don't get anything back, I don't know. Did you just > >> do "system_profiler" to s

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

on 23/06/04 20:08, Frank P. Eigler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> If you don't get any error message, then it's because the command is >> recognized. Now, why you don't get anything back, I don't know. Did you just >> do "system_profiler" to see or did you also included the 'grep' command? >> >

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Steve Fuller wrote: > > On Jun 23, 2004, at 1:08 PM, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > > > On 23/06/04 13:35, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >> > >>> On 23/06/04 13:09, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > On 23/06/04 13:35, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > > > >> On 23/06/04 13:09, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >>> >

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Jun 23, 2004, at 1:08 PM, Laurent Daudelin wrote: On 23/06/04 13:35, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: On 23/06/04 13:09, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: On 23/06/04 12:39, "Frank P.

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On 23/06/04 13:35, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >> On 23/06/04 13:09, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: >>> On 23/06/04 12:39, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > On 23/06/04 13:09, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > > > >> On 23/06/04 12:39, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bob wrote: > >>> > The Nat

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On 23/06/04 13:09, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >> On 23/06/04 12:39, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bob wrote: >>> The National Enquirer reports at 1:22 PM -0400 6/18/04, Timothy Luo

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > On 23/06/04 12:39, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bob wrote: > > > >> The National Enquirer reports at 1:22 PM -0400 6/18/04, Timothy Luoma wrote: > >>> > >>> Not sure how to tell how much RAM is installed via

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On 23/06/04 12:39, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bob wrote: > >> The National Enquirer reports at 1:22 PM -0400 6/18/04, Timothy Luoma wrote: >>> >>> Not sure how to tell how much RAM is installed via Terminal.app, but there >>> may be one. >> >> username$

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bob wrote: > The National Enquirer reports at 1:22 PM -0400 6/18/04, Timothy Luoma wrote: > > > >Not sure how to tell how much RAM is installed via Terminal.app, but there > >may be one. > > username$ system_profiler -detailLevel -2 |grep Memory > > -> Memory: 1.5 GB system:

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Jun 22, 2004, at 10:56 PM, Timothy Luoma wrote: Slick. TjL still looking for a way to do the same for FreeBSD and Linux. "df -h" should work under Linux "free" will show you memory and swap usage under Linux also try "cat /proc/meminfo" under Linux. same info, different format "dmesg | more" wi

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On 6/22/04 11:53 PM, "Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > username$ system_profiler -detailLevel -2 |grep Memory Slick. TjL still looking for a way to do the same for FreeBSD and Linux. -- G-Books is sponsored by and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.co

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

The National Enquirer reports at 1:22 PM -0400 6/18/04, Timothy Luoma wrote: >On 6/16/04 10:56 PM, "Samantha Goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And I'm thrilled, > > really I am, but, according to Apple, I bought it equipped with 256MB > > of ram and a 30GB hard drive. According to system

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

:) I bought an ibook rather than a desktop so I wouldn't be tempted to muck with it's innards. (I have this tendency to have great ideas, but I suck on the follow through, so I already have a house-full of computer bits I need to get rid of.) I'm planning on NOT learning how to get into this

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On 6/16/04 10:56 PM, "Samantha Goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And I'm thrilled, > really I am, but, according to Apple, I bought it equipped with 256MB > of ram and a 30GB hard drive. According to system profiler, I have > 640MB and a 55.76GB capacity hard drive. You can verify the hard d

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

06/16 Wed PM 10:56:38 EST > To: "G-Books" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Can System profiler be wrong? > > My refurb 12" G4 800Mhz ibook arrived on Monday. And I'm thrilled, > really I am, but, according to Apple, I bought it equipped with 256MB > of

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

Yes. It has happened to me and to my brother as well, usually when Apple has done an across the board upgrade between the time you order and the time they ship. Like they said, you lucked out, but it is one of the occasional little side benefits of doing business with Apple. Bruce Mitchell on 6/

Can System profiler be wrong?

My refurb 12" G4 800Mhz ibook arrived on Monday. And I'm thrilled, really I am, but, according to Apple, I bought it equipped with 256MB of ram and a 30GB hard drive. According to system profiler, I have 640MB and a 55.76GB capacity hard drive. My local reseller, essentially said I lucked ou