On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/6/06 12:58 PM, Frank P. Eigler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, TjL wrote:
[snip]
The fatal flaw to your plan is that it requires me doing all that.
Manually.
Manual backs are almost always out of date. (yes, to the 3 of
On Jan 7, 2006, at 3:01 AM, Frank P. Eigler wrote:
*General* rule of thumb: greater use = greater risk of wear =
greater risk of failure. But any BU is generally better than no BU
at all.
of course the long-standing hard drive controversy is what kind of
wear is more damaging: being on
I look at superDuper and I have used Carbon Cloner. Bu If you are
using Tiger There is better and faster way All you have to do is go
into Utilities then go to Restore drag the source disk to the first
blank then destaion to second blank then hit restore and it will
make duplicate of
on 06/01/06 08:13, R Michael Vogt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I look at superDuper and I have used Carbon Cloner. Bu If you are
using Tiger There is better and faster way All you have to do is go
into Utilities then go to Restore drag the source disk to the first
blank then destaion to
I can recommend SuperDuper--I've been using it for months now to do a
full backup of my HD. And I've tested the firewire drive as a
bootable device after the program's done the backup--everything is
where I put it, extras and all. It's pretty idiot-proof: something
that helps ME out a lot. :)
.. Original Message ...
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 06:13:49 -0700 R Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I look at superDuper and I have used Carbon Cloner. Bu If you are
using Tiger There is better and faster way All you have to do is go
into Utilities then go to Restore drag the
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, TjL wrote:
[snip]
The fatal flaw to your plan is that it requires me doing all that.
Manually.
Manual backs are almost always out of date. (yes, to the 3 of you who do
manual backups regularly, your discipline is impressive, but most of us
fail to meet your level of
.. Original Message ...
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:58:35 -0800 (PST) Frank P. Eigler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that would also seem to entail leaving your backup drive running all
night, unattended. Seems a little risky, unless you've got an A/B backup
routine going.
Actually the last
On 1/6/06 12:58 PM, Frank P. Eigler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, TjL wrote:
[snip]
The fatal flaw to your plan is that it requires me doing all that.
Manually.
Manual backs are almost always out of date. (yes, to the 3 of you who do
manual backups regularly, your
At 3:03 PM -0500 1/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/6/06 12:58 PM, Frank P. Eigler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, TjL wrote:
[snip]
The fatal flaw to your plan is that it requires me doing all that.
Manually.
Manual backs are almost always out of date. (yes, to the 3
On Jan 6, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Clark Martin wrote:
And, yeah, an A/B (or more) backup provides more protection. If
any of the above mentioned acts happens during a backup then you
are SOL unless you have multiple backups.
And keeping one of these external drives off-site offers even more
So I've been using SuperDuper to make a bootable backup of my
Powerbook (15 1.5Ghz)
It works great.
At least, that is, I think it does.
Truth is, I don't know if it would actually boot if I needed to, and
now that I've Googled around a bit, I can't seem to find out for sure.
The
on 05/01/06 23:09, Lists at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've been using SuperDuper to make a bootable backup of my
Powerbook (15 1.5Ghz)
It works great.
At least, that is, I think it does.
Truth is, I don't know if it would actually boot if I needed to, and
now that I've Googled
13 matches
Mail list logo
