on 20/2/03 12:23 PM, Obi-Wan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*sigh*
This is very depressing
Why is that? The Microsoft Mac Business unit is in charge of it. They have
a proven commitment to the Mac platform and make fantastic products for the
Mac...better than the corresponding
On Thursday, February 20, 2003, at 05:36 PM, Eric D. wrote:
Apple is the one who should have bought VPC -- Apple is in the best
position
to incorporate something like that into OS X seamlessly,
That's a good point, but I'll bet dollars to donuts that Job's
specifically didn't want to go
on 20/2/03 9:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VPC is kind of an umbilical cord that would prolong such dependency and
notion that Apple has to fit in to the M$ world to survive.
I wish that were the case but it isn't -- I'm running so many different apps
under VPC that I'd
on 20/2/03 10:33 PM, Eric D. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VPC is kind of an umbilical cord that would prolong such dependency and
notion that Apple has to fit in to the M$ world to survive.
I wish that were the case but it isn't -- I'm running so many different apps
For me, that is.
--
