Re: LCD vs. CRT

2005-05-29 Thread Bruce Johnson
On May 28, 2005, at 1:59 PM, Brian wrote: From what I've heard from others, CRTs have a longer useful life span than LCD monitors as well, and are significantly cheaper, which helps with the value equation. Well, the thing that goes on LCD's is the backlight, which is a $10 part, mostly

Re: LCD vs. CRT

2005-05-28 Thread Ruffin Bailey
> I agree with Dan. CRT monitors still have many uses. They certainly are the last component you'll need (note that I didn't say "want") to upgrade on your computer, which means two things to me: 1.) Don't scrimp on your monitor. If you want high resolution and a small footprint (LCD), pay

Re: LCD vs. CRT

2005-05-28 Thread Brian
From what I've heard from others, CRTs have a longer useful life span than LCD monitors as well, and are significantly cheaper, which helps with the value equation. Brian On May 28, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Claire Hart wrote: Having read the posts on what to do with old CRTs and also the dangers

Re: LCD vs. CRT

2005-05-28 Thread Zoltan Batiz
Claire, I agree with Dan. CRT monitors still have many uses. Take me for example. My main computer is a PowerBook Pismo. I have the Apple 17" CRT Studio display hooked up to it for web design purposes. With both LCD and CRT technology at my fingertips, I'm able to compare colors for som

Re: LCD vs. CRT

2005-05-28 Thread darm0k
At 11:29 AM -0500 05/28/2005, Claire Hart wrote: Having read the posts on what to do with old CRTs and also the dangers of photon beams zapping out of the ray guns and getting us all, I am left with questions on two trains of thought: (1) Is it wiser to buy a flat-panel monitor? Are we safer