You are correct... I mis-spoke... it is Mail...
On Feb 3, 2006, at 6:25 PM, phoenix wrote:
In /Safari/? Please don't mistake this for nit-picking, but I'm
genuinely curious if it's Safari (the web browser) or Mail.app that
you're
talking about -- or some other program. I don't think I've
We just got words from Dan, the List Mom, about the top-bottom posting issue
and here is what he said:
The rule applies regardless of the default behavior of any given email
client. We established the rule for four reasons:
1. It's logical. It shows the flow from message to response.
2. It
On Feb 3, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Laurent Daudelin wrote:
The rule applies regardless of the default behavior of any given
email
client. We established the rule for four reasons:
In Safari I found that there is a pref setting for sending your
signature to the bottom (I added an extra line of
On 03/02/06 15:02, sandra ragan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 3, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Laurent Daudelin wrote:
The rule applies regardless of the default behavior of any given
email
client. We established the rule for four reasons:
In Safari I found that there is a pref setting for
If you can modify your signature, you can also add 2 '-' characters at the
beginning of a line, just above your name and signature.
The standard is -- (dash dash space) on a line by itself. See RFC
3676 for instance.
Brian
--
G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog
--- Laurent Daudelin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We just got words from Dan, the List Mom, about the
top-bottom posting issue
and here is what he said:
The rule applies regardless of the default
behavior of any given email
client. We established the rule for four reasons:
1. It's
Quoth sandra ragan :
In Safari I found that there is a pref setting for sending your
signature to the bottom
In /Safari/? Please don't mistake this for nit-picking, but I'm
genuinely curious if it's Safari (the web browser) or Mail.app that you're
talking about -- or some other program. I
Stardate 060203.11:52 -0500. A subspace message from Laurent Daudelin reads:
1. It's logical. It shows the flow from message to response.
Historical note: RFC 1855 (which is what these rules are based on)
grew out of the inherent patchiness in UseNet NNTP propagation --
no-one could
