I would actually like to take issue that the Mac OS did not support
multi processors. I seem to remember several machines that were multi
processor from the 603e era, including one with 4 processors, if
memory serves, made by one of the clone manufacturers and I believe
the 8600 and 9600 were avai
True enough.
On Sep 9, 12:17 pm, Bruce Johnson
wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2009, at 7:48 AM, falst...@46 wrote:
>
>
>
> > Addressing the original question, you could use the older (at least a
> > g3) Macs to build a Mac Cluster. There have been universities and
> > gover
I already have the card. So it's not a cost issue at this time. As
mentioned above, this question has been raised and discussed on the
net before. Most discussions tend to spiral into personal preference
discussions. I was looking for a more definative answer in actual
benefits or lack thereof to
Addressing the original question, you could use the older (at least a
g3) Macs to build a Mac Cluster. There have been universities and
government agencies that have built, relatively inexpensive,
supercomputers using this method which is explained at this link;
http://www.daugerresearch.com/pooc
She lives in the same town. She doesn't use photoshop but does do
video renering/conversion. But she has one of those Miglia USB video
H264 dongles that is suppossed to take most of the pressure off the
CPU's for that job. Other than that it's just internet. email and
youtube. So I'm not sure she
