On Feb 23, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Don Wakefield wrote:
Sorry if this stretches the rules a bit, but some direction would be
greatly appreciated.
I am a member of several of these lists and have developed a problem
on one of the other lists. Namely the Leopard List.
My posts never seem to appea
On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Fabian Fang wrote:
> Until Lion is released in the coming months, Leopard and Snow Leopard are the
> current and latest Mac OS. It makes good sense for members of the G-Group to
> join our Leopard Group to seek or provide assistance.
Sorry to continue the meta-dis
On Feb 23, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Fabian Fang wrote:
Until Lion is released in the coming months, Leopard and Snow
Leopard are the current and latest Mac OS. It makes good sense for
members of the G-Group to join our Leopard Group to seek or
On 2011/02/23 10:06, Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:
If I were king of the forest, all these myriad LEM lists would be
reduced to a handful:
68K Macs (both laptop and desktops, because these are waaay obsolete
by now.) OldWorld Macs (PowerPC old world machines, both laptops and
desktops as ab
ac as well.
From: Bruce Johnson
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Cc: Fang Fabian
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Manager Comment] Re: Posting Problem.
If I were king of the forest, all these myriad LEM lists would be reduced to a
handful:
68K
On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Fabian Fang wrote:
>
>> Until Lion is released in the coming months, Leopard and Snow Leopard are
>> the current and latest Mac OS. It makes good sense for members of the
>> G-Group to join our Leopard Group
I am subscribed to 8 and I am finding it an administrative nightmare
organising them in a way that keeps me up to date but doesn't fill my inbox
up. I haven't decided on the best approach as yet.
Is 'forum' a dirty word in LEM land?
Jonathan
--
You received this message because you are a member
On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Jonathan Smith wrote:
> I am subscribed to 8 and I am finding it an administrative nightmare
> organising them in a way that keeps me up to date but doesn't fill my inbox
> up. I haven't decided on the best approach as yet.
>
> Is 'forum' a dirty word in LEM land?
On 2011/02/23 10:36, Jonathan Smith so eloquently wrote:
I am subscribed to 8 and I am finding it an administrative nightmare
organising them in a way that keeps me up to date but doesn't fill my
inbox up. I haven't decided on the best approach as yet.
I use filters to sort them into the mailbo
On Feb 23, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
Sorry to continue the meta-discussion, but I'd really like to add my
2 cents.
Please note that, in the above subject line, my message was in
response to a request for explanation of the posting problem to our
Leopard Group. For other dis
At 10:12 AM -0800 2/23/2011, Fabian Fang wrote:
I have no knowledge as to whether the LEM Group Owner reads messages
on the G-Group, or any other group. He is the sole "Decider" with
respect to setting up LEM Groups. Over the years, on our internal
"lemnannies" group, there have been discussi
At 10:06 AM -0700 2/23/2011, Bruce Johnson wrote:
Sorry to continue the meta-discussion, but I'd really like to add my 2 cents.
Um, yea. My 2 cents also: what Bruce said.
If I were king of the forest, all these myriad LEM lists would be
reduced to a handful:
68K Macs (both laptop and desk
> I'd even cut it some more but that's a great start!
>
>
> 1. 68K of all flavors
> 2. Pre "G" Power Macs of all flavors
> 3. "G" Power Macs of all flavors
> 4. Intel Macs of all flavors
> 5. Software group maybe
>
> Consolidation always results in greater efficiencies.
>
> After spending a goo
On Feb 23, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Dan wrote:
>>
>
> At 11:22 AM -0600 2/23/2011, James E. Therrault wrote:
>> 1. 68K of all flavors
>> 2. Pre "G" Power Macs of all flavors
>> 3. "G" Power Macs of all flavors
>> 4. Intel Macs of all flavors
>> 5. Software group maybe
>
> Too many groups, I think.
>
Previously, at 10:06 AM -0700 2/23/11, as Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:
>On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Fabian Fang wrote:
>
>> Until Lion is released in the coming months, Leopard and Snow Leopard are the
>>current and latest Mac OS. It makes good sense for members of the G-Group to
>>join
15 matches
Mail list logo
