PeterH wrote:
On May 16, 2009, at 8:43 PM, Clark Martin wrote:
CRTs have no inherent resolution ...
Sure they do.
They either have one and only one horizontal sweep frequency and one
and only one vertical sweep frequency, or they have sets of
horizontal and sets of vertical
On May 16, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Clark Martin wrote:
They either have one and only one horizontal sweep frequency and one
and only one vertical sweep frequency, or they have sets of
horizontal and sets of vertical sweep frequencies which are detected
by the interface and automatically switched
PeterH wrote:
On May 16, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Clark Martin wrote:
They either have one and only one horizontal sweep frequency and one
and only one vertical sweep frequency, or they have sets of
horizontal and sets of vertical sweep frequencies which are detected
by the interface and
From: Paul
On May 16, 3:41 pm, PeterH peterh5...@rattlebrain.com wrote:
On May 16, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Paul wrote:
Many, if not all, LCD monitors have a single best resolution and
frequency.
Many, if not all, monitors of ANY TYPE have a single best resolution
and frequency, moreso with
On May 17, 2009, at 4:12 AM, dorayme wrote:
However, both CRTs and LCDs need to be software herded into
displaying less.
Here's an interesting one how LCDs are TOO SHARP CRISP and make old
games look really BAD (too pixelated). Some students figured out how
to software herd the LCD
Some personal feelings about this thread.
Color CRT's have pixels. They are small dots of phosphor which are bombarded by
three electron guns that send rays (the R in CRT) through a mask so they only
hit their assigned dots. The R, G, and B drives modulate the intensity of the
electron beams
Many, if not all, LCD monitors have a single best resolution and
frequency. This resolution tends to be the highest possible for the
monitor, and the frequency is often 60 Hz. If you're trying to find it
out without looking up the documentation, there might be software to
query it and display it,
On May 16, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Paul wrote:
Many, if not all, LCD monitors have a single best resolution and
frequency.
Many, if not all, monitors of ANY TYPE have a single best resolution
and frequency, moreso with CRTs than with LCDs, however.
From: Clark Martin
dorayme wrote:
At long last, I got a better card than the original that came with my
QS 933, clearing the way for me to get a bigger screen.
But one thing that is puzzling is how to find out the native
resolution of my screens without digging out the documentation.
On May 16, 3:41 pm, PeterH peterh5...@rattlebrain.com wrote:
On May 16, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Paul wrote:
Many, if not all, LCD monitors have a single best resolution and
frequency.
Many, if not all, monitors of ANY TYPE have a single best resolution
and frequency, moreso with CRTs than
One way to tell if the fan stops is to open the case and take a peek.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on
Power Macs.
PeterH wrote:
On May 16, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Paul wrote:
Many, if not all, LCD monitors have a single best resolution and
frequency.
Many, if not all, monitors of ANY TYPE have a single best resolution
and frequency, moreso with CRTs than with LCDs, however.
Other way around. CRTs
dorayme wrote:
From: Clark Martin
dorayme wrote:
At long last, I got a better card than the original that came with my
QS 933, clearing the way for me to get a bigger screen.
But one thing that is puzzling is how to find out the native
resolution of my screens without digging out the
On May 16, 2009, at 8:43 PM, Clark Martin wrote:
CRTs have no inherent resolution ...
Sure they do.
They either have one and only one horizontal sweep frequency and one
and only one vertical sweep frequency, or they have sets of
horizontal and sets of vertical sweep frequencies which are
At long last, I got a better card than the original that came with my
QS 933, clearing the way for me to get a bigger screen.
But one thing that is puzzling is how to find out the native
resolution of my screens without digging out the documentation. There
seems no Mac software that tells
On May 15, 2009, at 9:35 PM, dorayme wrote:
But one thing that is puzzling is how to find out the native
resolution of my screens without digging out the documentation. There
seems no Mac software that tells this?
On a modern card connected to a modern monitor, the software reads
the
dorayme wrote:
At long last, I got a better card than the original that came with my
QS 933, clearing the way for me to get a bigger screen.
But one thing that is puzzling is how to find out the native
resolution of my screens without digging out the documentation. There
seems no Mac
17 matches
Mail list logo
