Re: Why not Safari 3.0.4

2010-06-02 Thread Bruce - in Orlando
Okay - Here is the web page where I am seeing this: http://www.shutterfly.com/sites/view.sfly?fid=3f138555b3c8ef48 As I originally said, this is a message coming when I try to enter my high school reunion social networking site (which is on Shutterfly). Not that I am planning to go to the reunio

Re: Was Re: Why not Safari 3.0.4 Now Webkit

2010-06-02 Thread Stephen Conrad
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Kris Tilford wrote: > On Jun 2, 2010, at 4:48 AM, Stephen Conrad wrote: > > How do I run Webkit? >> > > To run Webkit you download it and double-click the icon. > > Webkit is self-contained, meaning it's a stand-alone application that has > it's own self-contained

Re: Was Re: Why not Safari 3.0.4 Now Webkit

2010-06-02 Thread Kris Tilford
On Jun 2, 2010, at 4:48 AM, Stephen Conrad wrote: How do I run Webkit? To run Webkit you download it and double-click the icon. Webkit is self-contained, meaning it's a stand-alone application that has it's own self-contained frameworks. Safari installs System frameworks, hence, Safari ha

Was Re: Why not Safari 3.0.4 Now Webkit

2010-06-02 Thread Stephen Conrad
How do I run Webkit? -- Steve Conrad Henrietta, MO 64036 "The time has come for mankind to grow up and leave its cradle behind; to go forth and claim our place in outer space." - Capt. Henry Gloval (\__/) (='.'=) (")_(") Help Bunny Take Over The World! -- You received th

Re: Why not Safari 3.0.4

2010-06-01 Thread Charles Lenington
Dan wrote: At 6:41 AM -0700 5/30/2010, Bruce - in Orlando wrote: I just tried to go to my high school reunion social networking site (which is on Shutterfly). I seems that it requires Safari 3.0 or higher, EXCEPT 3.0.4. Naturally, that's what I have on my MDD running 10.4. Being a naturally s

Re: Why not Safari 3.0.4

2010-06-01 Thread Dan
At 12:19 AM -0400 6/1/2010, Dan wrote: At 2:07 PM -0700 5/31/2010, Bruce - in Orlando wrote: Quoth the Shutterfly message: "Shutterfly Sites requires one of the following browsers: Internet Explorer 6.0 + FireFox 1.5 + Safari 3.0 + (except 3.0.4) Ok. No idea what "message" is. Is that someth

Re: Why not Safari 3.0.4

2010-05-31 Thread Dan
At 2:07 PM -0700 5/31/2010, Bruce - in Orlando wrote: Quoth the Shutterfly message: "Shutterfly Sites requires one of the following browsers: Internet Explorer 6.0 + FireFox 1.5 + Safari 3.0 + (except 3.0.4) Ok. No idea what "message" is. Is that something a Shutterfly employee emailed to yo

Re: Why not Safari 3.0.4

2010-05-31 Thread Bruce - in Orlando
Quoth the Shutterfly message: "Shutterfly Sites requires one of the following browsers: Internet Explorer 6.0 + FireFox 1.5 + Safari 3.0 + (except 3.0.4) © Copyright Shutterfly 1999-2010. All rights reserved." Anyway, I guess I don't mind upgrading Safari all that much ... Bruce - in Orlando

Re: Why not Safari 3.0.4

2010-05-30 Thread Dan
At 5:52 PM -0500 5/30/2010, Stephen Conrad wrote: Insert my usual gripes about Safari 4.0.5 and its known memory leak. Oh, get over it. EVERY browser on the market leaks. 1) Just run WebKit Nightly on top of Safari 4.0.5. That way you get the latest Safari, with its HTML 5 support and the

Re: Why not Safari 3.0.4

2010-05-30 Thread Stephen Conrad
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Dan wrote: > At 6:41 AM -0700 5/30/2010, Bruce - in Orlando wrote: > >> I just tried to go to my high school reunion social networking site >> (which is on Shutterfly). I seems that it requires Safari 3.0 or >> higher, EXCEPT 3.0.4. Naturally, that's what I have

Re: Why not Safari 3.0.4

2010-05-30 Thread Dan
At 6:41 AM -0700 5/30/2010, Bruce - in Orlando wrote: I just tried to go to my high school reunion social networking site (which is on Shutterfly). I seems that it requires Safari 3.0 or higher, EXCEPT 3.0.4. Naturally, that's what I have on my MDD running 10.4. Being a naturally suspicious pe

Why not Safari 3.0.4

2010-05-30 Thread Bruce - in Orlando
I just tried to go to my high school reunion social networking site (which is on Shutterfly). I seems that it requires Safari 3.0 or higher, EXCEPT 3.0.4. Naturally, that's what I have on my MDD running 10.4. Being a naturally suspicious person, I want to know why this site would hate 3.0.4 so m