Fabián Flores Vadell ha scritto:
2010/4/13 Jussi Lahtinenjussi.lahti...@gmail.com:
Just in case:
REPEAT
b = TabStrip3.Count ' In fact, this does nothing usefull
INC a
UNTIL a TabStrip3.Count OR TabStrip3[a].Caption = IdCaption
This doesn't make same
Ricardo:
Could you post a example of your open forms method? I'm very interested on
it. It sound like something I have searching for a long time.
Gracias
Jorge
2010/4/13 Ricardo Díaz Martín oceanosoftlapa...@gmail.com
If It can help to someone, this is I always do:
When I'm going to open a
Hi Jorge,
While we wait to see if Ricardo wants to share his open forms method
(I'm also interested to see it), here's some code I have used before
(see attachment) where the opening/closing of forms is handled by a
module, which I've called RunController.
The module is set as the Startup Class
The C language, in facts, does not even have CONSTs - it goes with
#define. So, it would be correct to forbid STATIC when declaring CONSTs.
Surely this is not correct. ANSI C uses const, and C++ also uses the
const keyword.
#define (a preprocessor directive) is a relic from old C, and const
Les Hardy ha scritto:
The C language, in facts, does not even have CONSTs - it goes with
#define. So, it would be correct to forbid STATIC when declaring CONSTs.
Surely this is not correct. ANSI C uses const, and C++ also uses the
const keyword.
#define (a preprocessor directive)
Caveat:
Thank you very much for you module. I'll read it carefully.
Regards
2010/4/14 Caveat gam...@caveat.demon.co.uk
Hi Jorge,
While we wait to see if Ricardo wants to share his open forms method
(I'm also interested to see it), here's some code I have used before
(see attachment) where
2010/4/14 Doriano Blengino doriano.bleng...@fastwebnet.it:
Back to the beginning: a CONST declaration is something that uses no
memory, so it can not have instances, and hence it can not be STATIC.
On the other hand, a CONST is always static, because the effective data
it describes reside in
If you feel hurt I am sorry for that, it was not my intention to hurt
you, and I have no wish to prove you wrong.
I do still stand by my statement.
Regards
Les Hardy
Doriano Blengino wrote:
Les Hardy ha scritto:
The C language, in facts, does not even have CONSTs - it goes
This is a gb2 project example about we were talking. Excuse me but is in
Spanish (I got no enough time to do something better than this). I was
cutting/pasting for a while and deleting extra thinks to get this example.
If not exactly the same I use but I hope It can help you.
Caveat, I need an
Fabián Flores Vadell ha scritto:
2010/4/14 Doriano Blenginodoriano.bleng...@fastwebnet.it:
Back to the beginning: a CONST declaration is something that uses no
memory, so it can not have instances, and hence it can not be STATIC.
Thanks Doriano. I understand that. My question was
i don't know if richard want the user to be able to do anything on the
showed form before the tatal loading ...
the better way will be to do the loading in the timer by use the
timer.trigger function
the form .enabled will be set to false
and the timer just set the form.enabled to true when
Errata corrige:
Finally, your last lines of code do not work:
Yes, it works.
PRIVATE FUNCTION ScanTab(IdCaption AS String) AS Byte
DIM a AS Byte = 0
WHILE (aTabStrip1.Count - 1) AND (TabStrip1[a].Text
IdCaption)
INC a
WEND
Key.Text is not guaranteed to be set during a KeyRelease.
(Do you means readed? Ok, you are look at from compiler dev perspective.
Right?)
Why it's in that way?
Because Qt loses some information needed by the KeyRelease event when some
compound keys are used.
--
Benoît Minisini
2010/4/14 Doriano Blengino doriano.bleng...@fastwebnet.it:
And here we return on your idea about a good compiler - and it is mine
idea too.
I don't want judge if the Gambas compiler is good or not, I feel that
I don't have the knowledge or experience required for do that. But, I
shared with you
2010/4/14 Doriano Blengino doriano.bleng...@fastwebnet.it:
Errata corrige:
May be that I am missing something, but... how can you say that it works
if it omits to test the last item?
Time later, driving to home and still thinking about this routine, I
finally recalled what you wanted to
2010/4/14 Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net:
Key.Text is not guaranteed to be set during a KeyRelease.
But, refering to the values provided by the key class, is guaranted
their availability within the routines that are called from KeyPress?
Why it's in that way?
Because Qt loses
16 matches
Mail list logo
